Recycling Foundry Sands in Concrete: A Comparative Study on the Use of Green Sand and Chemically Bonded Sand as Partial Replacements for Natural Sand

Currently, many foundries successfully reuse sand multiple times within their production cycle. However, when the sand can no longer be reused, it is disposed of, resulting in environmental damage and high disposal costs for the company. The present research aims to explore the potential reuse of foundry sands as fine aggregate in concrete. Since this by-product is classified as non-hazardous waste, it can offer interesting opportunities for the recycling of a material that is currently one of the most widely used in the construction industry. This paper studies the potential reuse of green sand (GS) and chemically bonded sand (CBS) as a partial replacement for natural sand (NS) in concrete. Concrete specimens made with 10%, 20%, and 30% of foundry sand were tested, and a comparative analysis was carried out with the standard mixture in terms of chemical-physical properties, workability, and mechanical properties. The results showed a reduction in the performance of concrete specimens prepared with foundry sands. The lowest reductions in the strength, which were always below 10%, were observed for a 10% inclusion rate of both GS and CBS, with slightly better performance for CBS. Performance reductions tend to increase with higher replacement rates. However, these performance reductions turn out to be acceptable for concrete used in non-structural applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184245
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Materials Engineering and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recycling Foundry Sands in Concrete: A Comparative Study on the Use of Green Sand and Chemically Bonded Sand as Partial Replacements for Natural Sand

Enrico Radi, Pietro Di Maida, Corrado Sciancalepore, Luca Lanzoni et al.
1 citations
Materials
Materials Engineering and Processing
0.71
article

Recycling Foundry Sands in Concrete: A Comparative Study on the Use of Green Sand and Chemically Bonded Sand as Partial Replacements for Natural Sand

Enrico Radi, Pietro Di Maida, Corrado Sciancalepore, Luca Lanzoni, Daniel Milanese
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Currently, many foundries successfully reuse sand multiple times within their production cycle. However, when the sand can no longer be reused, it is disposed of, resulting in environmental damage and high disposal costs for the company. The present research aims to explore the potential reuse of foundry sands as fine aggregate in concrete. Since this by-product is classified as non-hazardous waste, it can offer interesting opportunities for the recycling of a material that is currently one of the most widely used in the construction industry. This paper studies the potential reuse of green sand (GS) and chemically bonded sand (CBS) as a partial replacement for natural sand (NS) in concrete. Concrete specimens made with 10%, 20%, and 30% of foundry sand were tested, and a comparative analysis was carried out with the standard mixture in terms of chemical-physical properties, workability, and mechanical properties. The results showed a reduction in the performance of concrete specimens prepared with foundry sands. The lowest reductions in the strength, which were always below 10%, were observed for a 10% inclusion rate of both GS and CBS, with slightly better performance for CBS. Performance reductions tend to increase with higher replacement rates. However, these performance reductions turn out to be acceptable for concrete used in non-structural applications.

MaterialsVol. 18(18)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Parma (IT)
Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica "Francesco Severi", Gruppo Nazionale per la Fisica Matematica, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Materials Engineering and Processing
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.