Constitutive Model Based on Stress Relaxation for Composite Modified Double-Base Propellants and Master Curve of Relaxation Modulus
This study investigates the constitutive model and relaxation modulus master curve of composite modified double-base (CMDB) propellants through uniaxial constant-rate tensile tests and stress relaxation tests. The experimental observations demonstrate that CMDB propellants exhibit pronounced strain-rate dependence and temperature dependence. Specifically, the yield stress and fracture strength of the propellant increase with increasing strain rate and decrease with increasing temperature. Conversely, the fracture strain increases with increasing temperature. The stress–strain curves of CMDB propellants display marked nonlinearity, attributed to progressive damage accumulation. The relaxation modulus increases significantly with decreasing temperature. Utilizing the time-temperature superposition principle, we constructed a master curve model for the relaxation modulus of CMDB propellants across varying temperatures. Furthermore, based on the observed stress relaxation behavior, a nonlinear constitutive model for CMDB propellants was developed. Theoretical predictions derived from this model show good agreement with experimental data. This model effectively captures the characteristic stress softening and damage evolution in CMDB propellants, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for assessing its mechanical performance and predicting its service life.
Authors
- Changsheng Zhou
- Xiong Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3445-6706)
- Jinsheng Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4212-5664)
- Yao Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5317-6446)
- Xiumin Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-3136)
Institutions
- Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Aerospace
- Published
- 2025-09-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12090817
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Energetic Materials and Combustion
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.86