Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methodology Paradigms

Which methodology is best for my research project? is the first question most research students and early career researchers ask. While a perfect answer does not exist, this conceptual paper provides some guidance as a point of departure in the right direction. The aim of this conceptual paper is, therefore, to present a comparative analysis of contemporary research methodologies. Although adopting one methodology than the other primarily depends on the research question, personal preference and prior experience and disposition, this analysis has found that mixed methodology research paradigm has the potential to producing more rigorous findings than relying on mono methods. This conceptual paper contributes to the methodological literature in two areas. First, it creates an awareness among research students and early career researchers about the availability of possible research methodologies to help them adopting suitable research designs to address their unique research questions. Second, it encourages researchers from all disciplines to engage in a dialogue with regards to adopting appropriate methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Practical Studies in Education
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v6i6.144
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methodology Paradigms

Muhibul Haq, Naveed Yasin
2 citations
Journal of Practical Studies in Education
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
17.85
article

Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methodology Paradigms

Muhibul Haq, Naveed Yasin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Which methodology is best for my research project? is the first question most research students and early career researchers ask. While a perfect answer does not exist, this conceptual paper provides some guidance as a point of departure in the right direction. The aim of this conceptual paper is, therefore, to present a comparative analysis of contemporary research methodologies. Although adopting one methodology than the other primarily depends on the research question, personal preference and prior experience and disposition, this analysis has found that mixed methodology research paradigm has the potential to producing more rigorous findings than relying on mono methods. This conceptual paper contributes to the methodological literature in two areas. First, it creates an awareness among research students and early career researchers about the availability of possible research methodologies to help them adopting suitable research designs to address their unique research questions. Second, it encourages researchers from all disciplines to engage in a dialogue with regards to adopting appropriate methodologies.

Journal of Practical Studies in EducationVol. 6(6)
Abu Dhabi University (AE), University of Worcester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methodology Paradigms — Muhibul Haq, Naveed Yasin · Journal of Practical Studies in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS