Discussion of the Fetus in Fetal Cardiology Consultations: A Qualitative Study

<b>Background:</b> While prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease is increasingly common, and communication is essential to minimizing familial stress, little is known about how the fetus is discussed in this setting. This study observed how clinicians and families refer to the fetus during initial fetal cardiology consultations. <b>Methods:</b> Initial fetal cardiology consultations from one institution were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A codebook was developed and used to code the transcripts. Codes included any reference to the fetus and any attribution of agency or mental states to the fetus. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen consultations performed by five clinicians from one academic institution were included. Clinicians and families most frequently referred to the fetus using personal terminology (e.g., third-person pronouns, a given name, or "son" or "daughter"). Impersonal terminology (e.g., "baby") was used less frequently, followed by medical terminology (e.g., "fetus"), which was only used in two consultations. In about half of the consultations, clinicians conferred agency or mental states on the fetus by attributing actions, emotions, or knowledge to the fetus. <b>Conclusions:</b> Fetal cardiology clinicians primarily use personal terminology when referring to the fetus during initial consultations. Familial preferences need to be evaluated to optimize communication and support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children12091211
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussion of the Fetus in Fetal Cardiology Consultations: A Qualitative Study

Abdesalam Soudi, Judy C. Chang, Kelsey Schweiberger, Justin T. Clapp et al.
Children
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Discussion of the Fetus in Fetal Cardiology Consultations: A Qualitative Study

Abdesalam Soudi, Judy C. Chang, Kelsey Schweiberger, Justin T. Clapp, Samantha Syme, Kelly W. Harris, Nadine A. Kasparian, Robert M. Arnold, Ann Kavanaugh‐McHugh
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> While prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease is increasingly common, and communication is essential to minimizing familial stress, little is known about how the fetus is discussed in this setting. This study observed how clinicians and families refer to the fetus during initial fetal cardiology consultations. <b>Methods:</b> Initial fetal cardiology consultations from one institution were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A codebook was developed and used to code the transcripts. Codes included any reference to the fetus and any attribution of agency or mental states to the fetus. <b>Results:</b> Nineteen consultations performed by five clinicians from one academic institution were included. Clinicians and families most frequently referred to the fetus using personal terminology (e.g., third-person pronouns, a given name, or "son" or "daughter"). Impersonal terminology (e.g., "baby") was used less frequently, followed by medical terminology (e.g., "fetus"), which was only used in two consultations. In about half of the consultations, clinicians conferred agency or mental states on the fetus by attributing actions, emotions, or knowledge to the fetus. <b>Conclusions:</b> Fetal cardiology clinicians primarily use personal terminology when referring to the fetus during initial consultations. Familial preferences need to be evaluated to optimize communication and support.

ChildrenVol. 12(9)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.