Erasing the Past: Assessing the Feasibility of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’ in Safeguarding Child Anonymity in India

In contemporary age of digitalisation, where childhood unfolds as much on the internet as in the physical world, the lasting nature of online information creates serious risks for the privacy and future opportunities of minors in India. The researcher, through this paper, critically evaluates the potential of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’ (RTBF) as a legal framework for safeguarding children’s anonymity amid their expanding digital footprints. The paper opens by emphasizing the heightened risks children face online, such as cyberbullying and damage to reputation, which are exacerbated by the enduring nature of internet content. It then situates the constitutional foundation of the Right to be Forgotten (RTBF) in the landmark Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India decision, where informational privacy was affirmed as a fundamental right. However, the paper highlights that in India, the RTBF remains both legally uncertain and inadequately addressed in legislation. An analysis of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act), reveals significant limitations: although the law introduces safeguards for children, it fails to recognize a broader right to erase data collected during childhood-an essential safeguard guaranteed under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This omission becomes especially apparent when compared with India’s strong anonymity protections under criminal justice laws like the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and the POCSO Act, 2012, exposing inconsistencies in the country’s child protection framework. The paper ultimately argues that while RTBF carries important conceptual value, it is not yet a reliable tool for protecting child anonymity in India. To bridge this gap, it calls for a comprehensive approach that includes targeted revisions to the DPDP Act, the development of a child-sensitive judicial framework by the Supreme Court, and the integration of technological and educational interventions-ensuring that children in India are genuinely granted a “right to a second chance.”

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.55520
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erasing the Past: Assessing the Feasibility of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’ in Safeguarding Child Anonymity in India

Pooja Kumari, Vishal Anand
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
article

Erasing the Past: Assessing the Feasibility of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’ in Safeguarding Child Anonymity in India

Pooja Kumari, Vishal Anand
article en

Abstract

In contemporary age of digitalisation, where childhood unfolds as much on the internet as in the physical world, the lasting nature of online information creates serious risks for the privacy and future opportunities of minors in India. The researcher, through this paper, critically evaluates the potential of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’ (RTBF) as a legal framework for safeguarding children’s anonymity amid their expanding digital footprints. The paper opens by emphasizing the heightened risks children face online, such as cyberbullying and damage to reputation, which are exacerbated by the enduring nature of internet content. It then situates the constitutional foundation of the Right to be Forgotten (RTBF) in the landmark Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India decision, where informational privacy was affirmed as a fundamental right. However, the paper highlights that in India, the RTBF remains both legally uncertain and inadequately addressed in legislation. An analysis of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act), reveals significant limitations: although the law introduces safeguards for children, it fails to recognize a broader right to erase data collected during childhood-an essential safeguard guaranteed under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This omission becomes especially apparent when compared with India’s strong anonymity protections under criminal justice laws like the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and the POCSO Act, 2012, exposing inconsistencies in the country’s child protection framework. The paper ultimately argues that while RTBF carries important conceptual value, it is not yet a reliable tool for protecting child anonymity in India. To bridge this gap, it calls for a comprehensive approach that includes targeted revisions to the DPDP Act, the development of a child-sensitive judicial framework by the Supreme Court, and the integration of technological and educational interventions-ensuring that children in India are genuinely granted a “right to a second chance.”

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.