Quantitative Evaluation of a Pan-European Multi-professional Digital Training Programme for Stopping Child Maltreatment (ERICA)

Abstract Child maltreatment is a global public health problem affecting individuals, families, and societies. Although there are a number of programmes aimed at preventing child maltreatment, there is limited information available on their effectiveness or impact. This study aims to quantitively evaluate a recently developed pan-European digital training programme for the identification and prevention of child maltreatment within families—ERICA. Professionals working with children and families who have limited experience in child protection (e.g. healthcare workers, teachers) were recruited for the ERICA training in the seven collaborator countries (England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Scotland). Participants were 303 professionals who completed online self-evaluation questionnaires. In each collaborator country, trainee skills and knowledge were self-assessed twice via an anonymous online questionnaire, pre- and post-ERICA training. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to summarise questionnaire items into latent components in self-assessed skills and knowledge across all participants ( n = 303), and then we compared pre- and post-training factor scores for participants with both pre- and post-responses ( n = 185) using mixed-effect regression. For all 52 questionnaire items, we found statistically significant improvements ( p < 0.001) between self-evaluated skills and knowledge comparing pre- and post-training. Exploratory analysis using PCA derived eight summary scales based on latent components, which addressed overall expertise, competence, skills, communication with children, engagement with the family, early signs, support, and intervention. The factor scores for the eight summary scales also showed consistent pre–post-training improvements. The findings suggest a likely improvement in trainees’ self-assessed skills and knowledge of child maltreatment after taking the ERICA digital training. Improvement was found across all seven countries, suggesting the training’s transferability across different settings and their unique cultural, legislative, and healthcare contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-025-00232-4
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Evaluation of a Pan-European Multi-professional Digital Training Programme for Stopping Child Maltreatment (ERICA)

Eija Paavilainen, Sarah Bekaert, Giedre Zlatkute, Lidia Zabłocka‐Żytka et al.
1 links
International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Quantitative Evaluation of a Pan-European Multi-professional Digital Training Programme for Stopping Child Maltreatment (ERICA)

Eija Paavilainen, Sarah Bekaert, Giedre Zlatkute, Lidia Zabłocka‐Żytka, Katherine Lisa Keenan, Heidi Rantanen, Cristina Crocamo, Małgorzata Woźniak‐Prus, R. Cioni, Emmanuelle Jouet, Jane V. Appleton, Michael Specka, Alex Baldacchino, Giovanni Viganò, Laura Roe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Child maltreatment is a global public health problem affecting individuals, families, and societies. Although there are a number of programmes aimed at preventing child maltreatment, there is limited information available on their effectiveness or impact. This study aims to quantitively evaluate a recently developed pan-European digital training programme for the identification and prevention of child maltreatment within families—ERICA. Professionals working with children and families who have limited experience in child protection (e.g. healthcare workers, teachers) were recruited for the ERICA training in the seven collaborator countries (England, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Scotland). Participants were 303 professionals who completed online self-evaluation questionnaires. In each collaborator country, trainee skills and knowledge were self-assessed twice via an anonymous online questionnaire, pre- and post-ERICA training. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to summarise questionnaire items into latent components in self-assessed skills and knowledge across all participants ( n = 303), and then we compared pre- and post-training factor scores for participants with both pre- and post-responses ( n = 185) using mixed-effect regression. For all 52 questionnaire items, we found statistically significant improvements ( p < 0.001) between self-evaluated skills and knowledge comparing pre- and post-training. Exploratory analysis using PCA derived eight summary scales based on latent components, which addressed overall expertise, competence, skills, communication with children, engagement with the family, early signs, support, and intervention. The factor scores for the eight summary scales also showed consistent pre–post-training improvements. The findings suggest a likely improvement in trainees’ self-assessed skills and knowledge of child maltreatment after taking the ERICA digital training. Improvement was found across all seven countries, suggesting the training’s transferability across different settings and their unique cultural, legislative, and healthcare contexts.

International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and PracticeVol. 8(4)
Oxford Brookes University (GB), Tampere University (FI), University of St Andrews (GB), University of Dundee (GB), Synergos Institute (US), Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon (FR), Essen University Hospital (DE), The Maria Grzegorzewska University (PL), University of Warsaw (PL), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.