Prediction with Incomplete Information

A key requirement for forming data-driven predictions is to assemble the best possible set of observations for the predictive variables. This task, however, is not often easy. In the case of time-series data, some variables have shorter histories than others, and some variables are reported less frequently than others. And in the case of cross-sectional data, some information is not reported for every case. We are therefore faced with several choices. We can discard predictive variables with missing information. We can exclude observations with missing information and retain only those with full information for all the predictive variables. We can use statistical techniques to manufacture replacements for the missing information. Each of these approaches, however, has significant drawbacks. The authors propose a new procedure for treating missing information that enables us to retain more information than model-based approaches and, at the same time, to account for the relative reliability of observations with missing information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Financial Data Science
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2025.1.199
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction with Incomplete Information

Megan Czasonis, Mark Kritzman, David Turkington
1 citations
The Journal of Financial Data Science
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
1.50
article

Prediction with Incomplete Information

Megan Czasonis, Mark Kritzman, David Turkington
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A key requirement for forming data-driven predictions is to assemble the best possible set of observations for the predictive variables. This task, however, is not often easy. In the case of time-series data, some variables have shorter histories than others, and some variables are reported less frequently than others. And in the case of cross-sectional data, some information is not reported for every case. We are therefore faced with several choices. We can discard predictive variables with missing information. We can exclude observations with missing information and retain only those with full information for all the predictive variables. We can use statistical techniques to manufacture replacements for the missing information. Each of these approaches, however, has significant drawbacks. The authors propose a new procedure for treating missing information that enables us to retain more information than model-based approaches and, at the same time, to account for the relative reliability of observations with missing information.

The Journal of Financial Data ScienceVol. 7(4)
State Street (United States) (US), IIT@MIT (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prediction with Incomplete Information — Megan Czasonis, Mark Kritzman, et al. · The Journal of Financial Data Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS