When Does Collocation of Physical and Mental Health Services Matter?

Problem definition: A key choice in operational decision making is whether to collocate services. Although prior work has highlighted the benefits of collocation, these benefits may need to be balanced with potential costs. Thus, it is critical to understand not just whether collocation matters, but also when and for whom. We consider collocation in the context of healthcare and ask: Does collocation of mental and physical health resources improve outcomes? This is important, as primary care serves as a gateway to address mental health concerns. We next study collocation’s relationship with patient complexity and with three social risk factors: age, race, and income. Finally, we investigate two pathways through which collocation impacts outcomes. Methodology/results: As America’s largest integrated healthcare system, the Veterans Health Administration offers an excellent setting to investigate these questions. We empirically analyze more than 112,000 patients—over an 11-year period—who suffer from chronic conditions and show evidence of mental illness. We find that collocation is associated with improvement in four key outcomes: hospitalizations, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, and suicidal behavior. For example, a one-standard-deviation increase in collocation is related to a 3.4% average reduction in LOS, roughly equivalent to a savings of $3.6 million annually, just for our cohort, with the majority of the savings coming from severely ill patients. Further, collocation benefits patients who are younger, are non-Hispanic Blacks, and those with low incomes. Finally, our analysis reveals that collocation improves outcomes (partially) through a reduction in no-shows and an increase in medication adherence. Managerial implications: Our work demonstrates the importance of collocation as a strategic operational lever and offers insights into where to target collocation and, broadly, how to design an operationally efficient system. Theoretically, we advance the location literature, emphasize task complexity as a key moderator, and highlight collocation’s value in addressing health/social inequities. Funding: C. A. Alvarez received research support from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [Award UL1 TR003163]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0662 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0662
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Does Collocation of Physical and Mental Health Services Matter?

Vishal Ahuja, Bradley R. Staats, Carlos A. Álvarez
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

When Does Collocation of Physical and Mental Health Services Matter?

Vishal Ahuja, Bradley R. Staats, Carlos A. Álvarez
article en

Abstract

Problem definition: A key choice in operational decision making is whether to collocate services. Although prior work has highlighted the benefits of collocation, these benefits may need to be balanced with potential costs. Thus, it is critical to understand not just whether collocation matters, but also when and for whom. We consider collocation in the context of healthcare and ask: Does collocation of mental and physical health resources improve outcomes? This is important, as primary care serves as a gateway to address mental health concerns. We next study collocation’s relationship with patient complexity and with three social risk factors: age, race, and income. Finally, we investigate two pathways through which collocation impacts outcomes. Methodology/results: As America’s largest integrated healthcare system, the Veterans Health Administration offers an excellent setting to investigate these questions. We empirically analyze more than 112,000 patients—over an 11-year period—who suffer from chronic conditions and show evidence of mental illness. We find that collocation is associated with improvement in four key outcomes: hospitalizations, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions, and suicidal behavior. For example, a one-standard-deviation increase in collocation is related to a 3.4% average reduction in LOS, roughly equivalent to a savings of $3.6 million annually, just for our cohort, with the majority of the savings coming from severely ill patients. Further, collocation benefits patients who are younger, are non-Hispanic Blacks, and those with low incomes. Finally, our analysis reveals that collocation improves outcomes (partially) through a reduction in no-shows and an increase in medication adherence. Managerial implications: Our work demonstrates the importance of collocation as a strategic operational lever and offers insights into where to target collocation and, broadly, how to design an operationally efficient system. Theoretically, we advance the location literature, emphasize task complexity as a key moderator, and highlight collocation’s value in addressing health/social inequities. Funding: C. A. Alvarez received research support from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [Award UL1 TR003163]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.0662 .

Manufacturing & Service Operations ManagementVol. 28(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Texas Tech University (US), Southern Methodist University (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.