Evidence of Oscillating Neutron-Capture Cross Sections

Analysis of neutron-capture cross sections in the resolved resonance range reveals that a large fraction of them (13 of 21, or 62%) exhibit highly significant (>99.9% confidence level) oscillations about their average value. Oscillations exceed a significance level of 5σ in nine cases (43%). Oscillations comprise 10.86±0.64% of the average cross section with periods ranging from 68.2 to 2380 eV. This contradicts random matrix theory (RMT), which predicts that fluctuations about the average cross section should be entirely random and demonstrates that deviations from RMT are common and widespread in neutron-capture data. These facts suggest there is a widespread physical mechanism that is missing from current nuclear physics models describing neutron-capture cross sections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Letters
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/bh31-4qq6
Primary Topic
Nuclear Physics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence of Oscillating Neutron-Capture Cross Sections

A. Stamatopoulos, P. Koehler
Physical Review Letters
Nuclear Physics and Applications
article

Evidence of Oscillating Neutron-Capture Cross Sections

A. Stamatopoulos, P. Koehler
article en

Abstract

Analysis of neutron-capture cross sections in the resolved resonance range reveals that a large fraction of them (13 of 21, or 62%) exhibit highly significant (>99.9% confidence level) oscillations about their average value. Oscillations exceed a significance level of 5σ in nine cases (43%). Oscillations comprise 10.86±0.64% of the average cross section with periods ranging from 68.2 to 2380 eV. This contradicts random matrix theory (RMT), which predicts that fluctuations about the average cross section should be entirely random and demonstrates that deviations from RMT are common and widespread in neutron-capture data. These facts suggest there is a widespread physical mechanism that is missing from current nuclear physics models describing neutron-capture cross sections.

Physical Review LettersVol. 135(11)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Nuclear Physics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.