Effects of confined boundaries on hovering flight using the unsteady vortex lattice method

Insect flight adjacent to single or multiple walls during hovering or approaching perching is common in nature. The aerodynamic forces of insects flying near multiple surfaces may deviate significantly from those experienced during normal hover over a single ground. This work investigates the effects of multiple walls on a three-dimensional hovering wing. The aerodynamics of the hovering wing is calculated by the unsteady vortex lattice method (UVLM). To handle the flow instabilities associated with strong wing-wake and wake-wake interactions in hover, a novel treatment of wake straining is incorporated with a vortex core growth model that stabilizes the numerical simulation and avoid numerical dispersion. The treatment significantly extends the capability of the UVLM and improves its accuracy in the modeling of wings during hovering flight. The ground effects are modeled by a lattice of bound vortices. To study the effects of multiple walls, two cases are considered: a pair of hovering wings in a U-shaped channel and between top and bottom walls. The lift coefficients and the flow fields are analyzed by varying the distance between the wing and the walls. Three typical regimes are identified due to the walls: force enhancement, force reduction and force recovery. The lift coefficient of the wing in the U-shaped channel is lower than the wing hovering over a single ground, while that of the wing between the top and the bottom walls is higher. These observations are closely related to the changes in wake and vortex structures causing changes in the downwash and effective angle of attack of the wing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0282333
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of confined boundaries on hovering flight using the unsteady vortex lattice method

John Young, Mudassir Ahmed, Fang-Bao Tian
2 citations
Physics of Fluids
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
9.99
article

Effects of confined boundaries on hovering flight using the unsteady vortex lattice method

John Young, Mudassir Ahmed, Fang-Bao Tian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Insect flight adjacent to single or multiple walls during hovering or approaching perching is common in nature. The aerodynamic forces of insects flying near multiple surfaces may deviate significantly from those experienced during normal hover over a single ground. This work investigates the effects of multiple walls on a three-dimensional hovering wing. The aerodynamics of the hovering wing is calculated by the unsteady vortex lattice method (UVLM). To handle the flow instabilities associated with strong wing-wake and wake-wake interactions in hover, a novel treatment of wake straining is incorporated with a vortex core growth model that stabilizes the numerical simulation and avoid numerical dispersion. The treatment significantly extends the capability of the UVLM and improves its accuracy in the modeling of wings during hovering flight. The ground effects are modeled by a lattice of bound vortices. To study the effects of multiple walls, two cases are considered: a pair of hovering wings in a U-shaped channel and between top and bottom walls. The lift coefficients and the flow fields are analyzed by varying the distance between the wing and the walls. Three typical regimes are identified due to the walls: force enhancement, force reduction and force recovery. The lift coefficient of the wing in the U-shaped channel is lower than the wing hovering over a single ground, while that of the wing between the top and the bottom walls is higher. These observations are closely related to the changes in wake and vortex structures causing changes in the downwash and effective angle of attack of the wing.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(9)
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.