AI Bias in Power Systems Domain—Exemplary Cases and Approaches

This paper examines artificial intelligence (AI) bias in power systems applications through systematic analysis of three critical use cases: load forecasting, predictive maintenance, and ontology matching for system interoperability. While AI solutions show great potential for addressing complex power system challenges, they face adoption barriers due to biases that compromise fairness, reliability, and operational performance. Our investigation demonstrates how different bias types—including data representation, algorithmic, and sampling biases—manifest in power systems contexts, directly affecting grid efficiency, resource allocation, and socioeconomic equity across the electrical power and energy domain. For each use case, we provide quantitative evidence of bias impact and propose targeted mitigation strategies that emphasize data diversity, ensemble methods, explainable AI techniques, and fairness-aware algorithms. By establishing a comprehensive taxonomy of bias types relevant to power systems and developing practical mitigation frameworks, this work bridges the critical gap between abstract bias concepts and real-world power system applications. The resulting framework provides a structured approach for developing equitable, robust AI systems that align with power systems’ operational requirements while accelerating the responsible adoption of AI in safety-critical infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18184819
Primary Topic
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Bias in Power Systems Domain—Exemplary Cases and Approaches

Abraham Ezema, Zhiyu Pan, Antonello Monti, Ferdinanda Ponci et al.
Energies
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
article

AI Bias in Power Systems Domain—Exemplary Cases and Approaches

Abraham Ezema, Zhiyu Pan, Antonello Monti, Ferdinanda Ponci, Chijioke Eze, L. E. Roth
article en

Abstract

This paper examines artificial intelligence (AI) bias in power systems applications through systematic analysis of three critical use cases: load forecasting, predictive maintenance, and ontology matching for system interoperability. While AI solutions show great potential for addressing complex power system challenges, they face adoption barriers due to biases that compromise fairness, reliability, and operational performance. Our investigation demonstrates how different bias types—including data representation, algorithmic, and sampling biases—manifest in power systems contexts, directly affecting grid efficiency, resource allocation, and socioeconomic equity across the electrical power and energy domain. For each use case, we provide quantitative evidence of bias impact and propose targeted mitigation strategies that emphasize data diversity, ensemble methods, explainable AI techniques, and fairness-aware algorithms. By establishing a comprehensive taxonomy of bias types relevant to power systems and developing practical mitigation frameworks, this work bridges the critical gap between abstract bias concepts and real-world power system applications. The resulting framework provides a structured approach for developing equitable, robust AI systems that align with power systems’ operational requirements while accelerating the responsible adoption of AI in safety-critical infrastructure.

EnergiesVol. 18(18)
Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Electricity Theft Detection Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.