Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Prediction of Tolerance to Inhaled Treprostinil in Patients with PAH or PH-ILD

<b>Background</b>: Treprostinil has demonstrated effectiveness in treating Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) and Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Interstitial Lung Disease (PH-ILD). However, tolerability remains a clinical challenge. Identifying factors influencing tolerability is important, given the adverse outcomes of PAH and PH-ILD and the potential of treprostinil to slow disease progression. Objective: This study was undertaken to identify tolerance factors and develop a predictive scoring system. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis of 65 patients (37 PAH, 28 PH-ILD) was conducted using patient history, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs), and right heart catheterizations (RHCs). Of these, 67.7% (<i>n</i> = 44) tolerated treprostinil, while 32.3% (<i>n</i> = 21) were intolerant. <b>Results</b>: Patients who tolerated treprostinil had better pulmonary function, with a higher forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) ratio (82.27 ± 16.06 vs. 72.86 ± 17.76, <i>p</i> = 0.037) and superior right ventricular function, as indicated by higher tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE: 2.05 ± 0.37 vs. 1.64 ± 0.42, <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher cardiac index (CI: 2.51 ± 0.67 vs. 2.03 ± 0.53, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and improved functional status (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The Inhaled Treprostinil Intolerance Score (ITIS), incorporating TAPSE < 1.6, CI < 2, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 70%, and WHO functional class (FC) 3 or 4, demonstrated strong predictive accuracy (cutoff ≥ 2, AUC = 0.884 ± 0.048, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Predictive performance was stronger in PAH patients (AUC = 0.921 ± 0.053) than PH-ILD (AUC = 0.833 ± 0.093, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings demonstrate the importance of clinical parameters in predicting treprostinil tolerance. Further investigation is warranted to refine the scoring system, particularly for PH-ILD patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186395
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Prediction of Tolerance to Inhaled Treprostinil in Patients with PAH or PH-ILD

J. Bahgat, Raj Parikh, Obada Kholoki, Harrison W. Farber et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
article

Development and Validation of a Scoring System for Prediction of Tolerance to Inhaled Treprostinil in Patients with PAH or PH-ILD

J. Bahgat, Raj Parikh, Obada Kholoki, Harrison W. Farber, Ashwin S. Kumar, Brett Carollo, David M. O’Sullivan, A. Lanurias Diaz, Karen L. Swanson
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Treprostinil has demonstrated effectiveness in treating Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) and Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Interstitial Lung Disease (PH-ILD). However, tolerability remains a clinical challenge. Identifying factors influencing tolerability is important, given the adverse outcomes of PAH and PH-ILD and the potential of treprostinil to slow disease progression. Objective: This study was undertaken to identify tolerance factors and develop a predictive scoring system. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis of 65 patients (37 PAH, 28 PH-ILD) was conducted using patient history, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs), and right heart catheterizations (RHCs). Of these, 67.7% (<i>n</i> = 44) tolerated treprostinil, while 32.3% (<i>n</i> = 21) were intolerant. <b>Results</b>: Patients who tolerated treprostinil had better pulmonary function, with a higher forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) ratio (82.27 ± 16.06 vs. 72.86 ± 17.76, <i>p</i> = 0.037) and superior right ventricular function, as indicated by higher tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE: 2.05 ± 0.37 vs. 1.64 ± 0.42, <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher cardiac index (CI: 2.51 ± 0.67 vs. 2.03 ± 0.53, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and improved functional status (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The Inhaled Treprostinil Intolerance Score (ITIS), incorporating TAPSE < 1.6, CI < 2, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 70%, and WHO functional class (FC) 3 or 4, demonstrated strong predictive accuracy (cutoff ≥ 2, AUC = 0.884 ± 0.048, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Predictive performance was stronger in PAH patients (AUC = 0.921 ± 0.053) than PH-ILD (AUC = 0.833 ± 0.093, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings demonstrate the importance of clinical parameters in predicting treprostinil tolerance. Further investigation is warranted to refine the scoring system, particularly for PH-ILD patients.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(18)
Tufts Medical Center (US), Hartford Hospital (US), University of Connecticut (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States), UConn Health (US)
Tufts Medical Center, University of Connecticut
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.