Postoperative Outcomes in Gingival Re-exposure

Gingival surgical re-exposure outcomes vary significantly based on procedural technique and patient-specific factors. This study investigated how sociodemographic variables—age, gender, education level, economic status—and surgical methods (laser vs. punch bur) influence postoperative pain, healing, and satisfaction. The study aimed to identify predictors of optimal recovery to support personalized periodontal care. A cross-sectional design was employed, enrolling 60 adults aged 18–65 undergoing gingival procedures. Participants were categorized by surgical technique and sociodemographic strata. Postoperative outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Landry Healing Index for healing, and a 5-point Likert scale for satisfaction. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Results revealed that surgery type (p=0.007), education level (p=0.031), and economic status (p=0.014) significantly influenced recovery outcomes. Patients who underwent laser procedures experienced lower pain levels and higher satisfaction, while those with higher education and income demonstrated better healing and compliance. Age, gender, and residency did not show statistically significant effects. Visual analysis through Figures 4–10 confirmed the robustness of these findings, especially the consistent predictive power of surgical method. The hypothesis that sociodemographic factors influence recovery was confirmed. These findings support the integration of patient background into surgical planning. In conclusion, laser surgery should be prioritized when feasible, and tailored postoperative care should be developed for individuals with lower education or financial limitations to improve recovery outcomes and equity in care.