A Study on Semantic Cognitive Error of the Chinese Word—“duō shǎo”

From the perspective of semantic cognition, this study conducts an in-depth investigation into the errors involving the Chinese word “duōshǎo (how many)” , categorizing them into “intrusive errors” and “deviant errors.” Through analyzing the usage of “duōshǎo (how many)” in the HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, it is found that intrusive errors mainly manifest as the inappropriate insertion of “duōshǎo” into linguistic contexts where “hěnduō (a lot of)” , “dà xiǎo (size),” or structures like “duō/duōme (how)+ adj/bù (not) adj” should be used. Deviant errors, on the other hand, occur when words such as “henduō (a lot of),” “duō (much)” , or “xiǎo (small)” are incorrectly substituted for “duōshǎo (how many/many).” Furthermore, this paper explores the semantic-cognitive reasons behind these errors, highlighting that the characteristics of dimensional adjectives and the difficulty Chinese learners face in comprehending vague quantitative meanings are key factors contributing to these mistakes. The findings provide significant insights for Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language (TCFL) and language acquisition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Strategies in Study
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63808/css.v1i2.73
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Semantic Cognitive Error of the Chinese Word—“duō shǎo”

Zhiheng Yan
Cognitive Strategies in Study
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

A Study on Semantic Cognitive Error of the Chinese Word—“duō shǎo”

Zhiheng Yan
article en

Abstract

From the perspective of semantic cognition, this study conducts an in-depth investigation into the errors involving the Chinese word “duōshǎo (how many)” , categorizing them into “intrusive errors” and “deviant errors.” Through analyzing the usage of “duōshǎo (how many)” in the HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, it is found that intrusive errors mainly manifest as the inappropriate insertion of “duōshǎo” into linguistic contexts where “hěnduō (a lot of)” , “dà xiǎo (size),” or structures like “duō/duōme (how)+ adj/bù (not) adj” should be used. Deviant errors, on the other hand, occur when words such as “henduō (a lot of),” “duō (much)” , or “xiǎo (small)” are incorrectly substituted for “duōshǎo (how many/many).” Furthermore, this paper explores the semantic-cognitive reasons behind these errors, highlighting that the characteristics of dimensional adjectives and the difficulty Chinese learners face in comprehending vague quantitative meanings are key factors contributing to these mistakes. The findings provide significant insights for Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language (TCFL) and language acquisition.

Cognitive Strategies in StudyVol. 1(2)
Tianjin University of Technology and Education (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.