Between- and within-person relations between treatment modules and symptom improvements across six randomized controlled trials

Objective: Most youth psychotherapies contain multiple treatment elements; little is known about their relative effectiveness. We assessed symptom improvements associated with treatment elements, represented by modules within modular psychotherapy.Methods: Data from six clinical trials of the MATCH modular psychotherapy were combined (N=490; 5403 sessions; 6-15 years) to test effects of modules grouped into seven common treatment principles: Feeling Calm (e.g., relaxation strategies), Increasing Motivation (e.g., contingency management), Repairing Thoughts (e.g., cognitive restructuring), Solving Problems (e.g., problem solving), Trying the Opposite (e.g., exposure), Engagement/Psychoeducation (e.g., building rapport), and Future Planning (e.g., planning skill use). Multi-level models with autoregressive covariance controlled for previous symptoms, session number, and baseline symptoms; accounted for temporality with each session occurring prior to associated outcomes; importantly, we modeled associations between outcomes and between- and within-person use of treatment principles. Measures included weekly youth- and caregiver-reported internalizing, externalizing, and total symptoms, plus idiographic top problems.Results: A between-person effect linked Future Planning (B’s=-.369 — -.368; p’s<.05) to better outcomes. Better within-person effects were observed for Increasing Motivation (B’s=-0.087 — -0.057; p's<.05), Trying the Opposite (B’s=-.087 – -.056); p’s<.05), and Future Planning (B=-0.146; p<.001). Six outcomes showed worse within-person effects for Engagement/Psychoeducation (B’s=.036 — .099; p’s<.05); efforts to build engagement drove this finding; those efforts were associated with less use of skills-focused principles.Conclusions: Increasing Motivation, Trying the Opposite, and Future Planning were associated with especially good outcomes; therapists’ engagement attempts were associated with less focus on skill-building, and poorer immediate outcomes. Results may inform youth psychotherapy decision-making research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wxpfm_v1
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between- and within-person relations between treatment modules and symptom improvements across six randomized controlled trials

Bruce F. Chorpita, Christian A. Webb, Patrick Mair, Sally Merry et al.
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
article

Between- and within-person relations between treatment modules and symptom improvements across six randomized controlled trials

Bruce F. Chorpita, Christian A. Webb, Patrick Mair, Sally Merry, John R. Weisz, Katherine E. Venturo‐Conerly, Emma Hill
article en

Abstract

Objective: Most youth psychotherapies contain multiple treatment elements; little is known about their relative effectiveness. We assessed symptom improvements associated with treatment elements, represented by modules within modular psychotherapy.Methods: Data from six clinical trials of the MATCH modular psychotherapy were combined (N=490; 5403 sessions; 6-15 years) to test effects of modules grouped into seven common treatment principles: Feeling Calm (e.g., relaxation strategies), Increasing Motivation (e.g., contingency management), Repairing Thoughts (e.g., cognitive restructuring), Solving Problems (e.g., problem solving), Trying the Opposite (e.g., exposure), Engagement/Psychoeducation (e.g., building rapport), and Future Planning (e.g., planning skill use). Multi-level models with autoregressive covariance controlled for previous symptoms, session number, and baseline symptoms; accounted for temporality with each session occurring prior to associated outcomes; importantly, we modeled associations between outcomes and between- and within-person use of treatment principles. Measures included weekly youth- and caregiver-reported internalizing, externalizing, and total symptoms, plus idiographic top problems.Results: A between-person effect linked Future Planning (B’s=-.369 — -.368; p’s<.05) to better outcomes. Better within-person effects were observed for Increasing Motivation (B’s=-0.087 — -0.057; p's<.05), Trying the Opposite (B’s=-.087 – -.056); p’s<.05), and Future Planning (B=-0.146; p<.001). Six outcomes showed worse within-person effects for Engagement/Psychoeducation (B’s=.036 — .099; p’s<.05); efforts to build engagement drove this finding; those efforts were associated with less use of skills-focused principles.Conclusions: Increasing Motivation, Trying the Opposite, and Future Planning were associated with especially good outcomes; therapists’ engagement attempts were associated with less focus on skill-building, and poorer immediate outcomes. Results may inform youth psychotherapy decision-making research and practice.

Harvard University Press (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.