Epistemically Suspect Beliefs about COVID-19: Results from a Population Survey in Finland

We examined the familiarity and popularity of epistemically suspect claims (misinformation and conspiracy theories) about COVID-19 and their associations with cognitive and social factors in a representative population sample (N=1,077, Mage = 51.45, SDage = 16.58) of people living in Finland during the pandemic (September 2021-January 2022). Of cognitive factors, pseudoscientific beliefs, lower scores on the actively open-minded thinking scale, and higher preference for anecdotal information were related to increased tendency to believe in epistemically suspect claims related to COVID-19. Of social factors, lower trust in governmental institutions and science and scientists, and the use of alternative media were associated with the endorsement of epistemically suspect claims about COVID-19. Men were more likely to endorse epistemically suspect claims than women, and the support decreased with age. The present results suggest that epistemically suspect beliefs about COVID-19 are not generally common among the Finnish population. The results suggest that battling the spread of health-related misinformation, like COVID-19 conspiracy theories, may require actions that target different cognitive and social factors, such as the thinking style of individuals; trust felt towards governmental institutions, science, and mainstream media; and the content circulating in social and alternative media.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wce3f_v2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemically Suspect Beliefs about COVID-19: Results from a Population Survey in Finland

Johanna K. Kaakinen, Tuomo Häikiö, Ali Moazami-Goodarzi, Daria Pritup et al.
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Epistemically Suspect Beliefs about COVID-19: Results from a Population Survey in Finland

Johanna K. Kaakinen, Tuomo Häikiö, Ali Moazami-Goodarzi, Daria Pritup, Karl Otto Mäki, Pasi Kivioja
article en

Abstract

We examined the familiarity and popularity of epistemically suspect claims (misinformation and conspiracy theories) about COVID-19 and their associations with cognitive and social factors in a representative population sample (N=1,077, Mage = 51.45, SDage = 16.58) of people living in Finland during the pandemic (September 2021-January 2022). Of cognitive factors, pseudoscientific beliefs, lower scores on the actively open-minded thinking scale, and higher preference for anecdotal information were related to increased tendency to believe in epistemically suspect claims related to COVID-19. Of social factors, lower trust in governmental institutions and science and scientists, and the use of alternative media were associated with the endorsement of epistemically suspect claims about COVID-19. Men were more likely to endorse epistemically suspect claims than women, and the support decreased with age. The present results suggest that epistemically suspect beliefs about COVID-19 are not generally common among the Finnish population. The results suggest that battling the spread of health-related misinformation, like COVID-19 conspiracy theories, may require actions that target different cognitive and social factors, such as the thinking style of individuals; trust felt towards governmental institutions, science, and mainstream media; and the content circulating in social and alternative media.

Strategic Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.