Experiences and strategies of individuals with concomitant intellectual disabilities and cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review

Background Cancer care for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) is challenging, with evidence of disparities, late diagnoses, and overlooked experiences of the individuals in question. Aim To explore how individuals with concomitant ID and cancer experience the illness and navigate cancer care trajectories and everyday life from perspectives of themselves, their relatives and professionals. Method A qualitative systematic literature review was conducted across the databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, ERIC, SocINDEX, PsycInfo, and Scopus, supplemented by a final search in Google Scholar. All studies were screened and selected in Covidence according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review included 16 publications, registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251042718) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included publications was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative research. Data extraction was followed by a descriptive summary and a qualitative thematic analysis, inspired by Braun and Clarke. Results The studies, conducted in four countries, represented the voices of 22 individuals with ID and cancer and, in addition, perspectives of 11 relatives and 32 professionals. Data was synthesized in four themes: “ Emotional responses to having cancer,” “Coping with cancer - life went on,” “Balancing the right to information and the limits of communication abilities,” and “Encountering death in various ways.” Individuals with ID responded to cancer and related challenges in diverse ways, yet they often demonstrated an ability to live in the moment as a coping strategy and strength in living and dying with cancer. They received information to varying degrees about their cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, while also having differing capacities to understand and process this information. Experiences of cancer in others contributed to their understanding of their own condition. Conclusion Individuals with ID responded to cancer and its trajectory in varied ways. Many faced challenges in interactions with healthcare professionals, often due to communication barriers. Everyday routines and “living in the moment” served as important coping strategies. All 22 voices of individuals with ID represented in the studies came from the United Kingdom. Worldwide, future research should actively involve this population throughout the process. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251042718 , PROSPERO: CRD420251042718.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cancer Control and Society
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcacs.2025.1659795
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences and strategies of individuals with concomitant intellectual disabilities and cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review

Michal Soffer, Stinne Glasdam, Cong Fu
1 citations
Frontiers in Cancer Control and Society
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
3.49
article

Experiences and strategies of individuals with concomitant intellectual disabilities and cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review

Michal Soffer, Stinne Glasdam, Cong Fu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Cancer care for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) is challenging, with evidence of disparities, late diagnoses, and overlooked experiences of the individuals in question. Aim To explore how individuals with concomitant ID and cancer experience the illness and navigate cancer care trajectories and everyday life from perspectives of themselves, their relatives and professionals. Method A qualitative systematic literature review was conducted across the databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, ERIC, SocINDEX, PsycInfo, and Scopus, supplemented by a final search in Google Scholar. All studies were screened and selected in Covidence according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review included 16 publications, registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251042718) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included publications was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative research. Data extraction was followed by a descriptive summary and a qualitative thematic analysis, inspired by Braun and Clarke. Results The studies, conducted in four countries, represented the voices of 22 individuals with ID and cancer and, in addition, perspectives of 11 relatives and 32 professionals. Data was synthesized in four themes: “ Emotional responses to having cancer,” “Coping with cancer - life went on,” “Balancing the right to information and the limits of communication abilities,” and “Encountering death in various ways.” Individuals with ID responded to cancer and related challenges in diverse ways, yet they often demonstrated an ability to live in the moment as a coping strategy and strength in living and dying with cancer. They received information to varying degrees about their cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, while also having differing capacities to understand and process this information. Experiences of cancer in others contributed to their understanding of their own condition. Conclusion Individuals with ID responded to cancer and its trajectory in varied ways. Many faced challenges in interactions with healthcare professionals, often due to communication barriers. Everyday routines and “living in the moment” served as important coping strategies. All 22 voices of individuals with ID represented in the studies came from the United Kingdom. Worldwide, future research should actively involve this population throughout the process. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251042718 , PROSPERO: CRD420251042718.

Frontiers in Cancer Control and SocietyVol. 3
Lund University (SE), University of Haifa (IL)
Lunds Universitet, Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.