Mathematical Metacognitive Skills and Academic Resilience of Mathematics Education Students: A Mixed- methods Study

This study explored how mathematical metacognitive skills relate to academic resilience among mathematics education students from a local college in Davao del Norte. Implementing both qualitative and quantitative strategies, data were gathered from 131 students through structured questionnaires, while deeper insights came from in-depth interviews and group discussions involving 14 purposively selected informants. The results showed that students generally had high levels of both metacognitive skills and resilience. A significant positive correlation, r(129) = .534, p < .05, suggested that those better at regulating their thinking and problem-solving were also more capable of returning from academic challenges. This correlation corresponds to a large effect size of approximately Cohen’s d = 1.27, indicating that the relationship is not only statistically significant but also practically meaningful in real educational settings. Students shared stories of struggling to manage their learning, yet many described how they learned to reflect on their mistakes, seek support from classmates, and take more initiative over time. Taken together, the findings show that metacognitive skills have a meaningful impact on helping learners stay strong and succeed in the face of academic pressure. This points to the value of embedding metacognitive training in math education, encouraging peer support, and creating learning spaces that help students grow not just academically, but personally as well.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64637/631981
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical Metacognitive Skills and Academic Resilience of Mathematics Education Students: A Mixed- methods Study

Rieczarine Ann Pancho
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Mathematical Metacognitive Skills and Academic Resilience of Mathematics Education Students: A Mixed- methods Study

Rieczarine Ann Pancho
article en

Abstract

This study explored how mathematical metacognitive skills relate to academic resilience among mathematics education students from a local college in Davao del Norte. Implementing both qualitative and quantitative strategies, data were gathered from 131 students through structured questionnaires, while deeper insights came from in-depth interviews and group discussions involving 14 purposively selected informants. The results showed that students generally had high levels of both metacognitive skills and resilience. A significant positive correlation, r(129) = .534, p < .05, suggested that those better at regulating their thinking and problem-solving were also more capable of returning from academic challenges. This correlation corresponds to a large effect size of approximately Cohen’s d = 1.27, indicating that the relationship is not only statistically significant but also practically meaningful in real educational settings. Students shared stories of struggling to manage their learning, yet many described how they learned to reflect on their mistakes, seek support from classmates, and take more initiative over time. Taken together, the findings show that metacognitive skills have a meaningful impact on helping learners stay strong and succeed in the face of academic pressure. This points to the value of embedding metacognitive training in math education, encouraging peer support, and creating learning spaces that help students grow not just academically, but personally as well.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and InnovationVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.