From hashtags to hostility: global dynamics of climate denialism on Twitter in the post-COVID era

The rise of climate denialism in the general population ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:math> 5% between 2019 and 2023) has been accompanied by a very significant increase in denialist activism on “X”/Twitter since the summer of 2022, and increased hostility towards climate scientists. Through global tracking of Twitter exchanges about climate change between 2019 and 2023, as well as exchanges about COVID-19 pandemics, we analyzed this online trend and its interaction with other societal issues like politics and COVID-19 pandemics. Beyond fact-checking, we show, through complex networks and semantic analyses, that there are structural differences between these denialist and pro-climate online communities, as well as between the circulation of false information and other climate change-related narratives. All the evidence suggests that the behavior of deniers is designed to deceive, and that they are over-represented on social networks compared to what they actually represent offline. This is particularly true on “X”/Twitter since Musk’s takeover. We have also highlighted the globalized aspect of this new denialism, its alignment with the interests and visions of powers such as Russia and how it has benefited from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comptes Rendus Géoscience
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.304
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From hashtags to hostility: global dynamics of climate denialism on Twitter in the post-COVID era

Victor Chomel, Maziyar Panahi, David Chavalarias, Paul Bouchaud
Comptes Rendus Géoscience
Social Media and Politics
article

From hashtags to hostility: global dynamics of climate denialism on Twitter in the post-COVID era

Victor Chomel, Maziyar Panahi, David Chavalarias, Paul Bouchaud
article en

Abstract

The rise of climate denialism in the general population ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> </mml:math> 5% between 2019 and 2023) has been accompanied by a very significant increase in denialist activism on “X”/Twitter since the summer of 2022, and increased hostility towards climate scientists. Through global tracking of Twitter exchanges about climate change between 2019 and 2023, as well as exchanges about COVID-19 pandemics, we analyzed this online trend and its interaction with other societal issues like politics and COVID-19 pandemics. Beyond fact-checking, we show, through complex networks and semantic analyses, that there are structural differences between these denialist and pro-climate online communities, as well as between the circulation of false information and other climate change-related narratives. All the evidence suggests that the behavior of deniers is designed to deceive, and that they are over-represented on social networks compared to what they actually represent offline. This is particularly true on “X”/Twitter since Musk’s takeover. We have also highlighted the globalized aspect of this new denialism, its alignment with the interests and visions of powers such as Russia and how it has benefited from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comptes Rendus GéoscienceVol. 357(G1)
Institute for Complex Systems (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.