Equity, diversity and inclusion in Canada's forest sector labour force: Are we making progress?

Around the world, the labour force supporting commercial forestry has been male-dominated and Canada is no exception. Women, Indigenous Peoples and immigrants in Canada often face systemic barriers such as racism, sexism that result in specific inequalities including income disparities, job segregation, and uneven opportunities for training and mentorship. In response, federal and provincial governments, industry, and educational institutions have introduced policies and taken action to enhance equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in the labour force across multiple sectors. In this paper, we explore Canada's progress in building a diverse and equitable forestry labour force. We analysed data from national forestry strategies (1981–2019), State of Canada's Forests Reports (1990–2023), and the quinquennial national Census (1991–2021), using proxies to examine progress in employment opportunities and representation of three equity-denied groups: women, Indigenous Peoples, and immigrants. Although there are high-level policies for EDI, federal government documents for the forest sector revealed little attention to EDI, with the exception of promoting opportunities for Indigenous workers. Census data show slow and uneven progress with respect to labour force participation, income, and job segregation in forestry. While there is progress in opportunities for Indigenous people, the data show that they still have lower incomes and occupy fewer management positions than others employed in commercial forestry. We reflect on several limitationsin the available data and conclude that if the forest sector in Canada and other similar contexts seeks to advance EDI in its forestry labour force, it must commit to broad motivations for diversity beyond industry competitiveness, set clear targets, introduce new practices, take action and publicly report on the results. • In Canada, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) policies aim to reduce inequities in labour force • National forest sector strategies and reporting are weak are inconsistent on EDI in the labour force. • Census data show that women, Indigenous Peoples, and immigrants are underrepresented in forestry • Availability of data limits the ability to examine progress in EDI • Clear targets and measures and public reporting are needed to advance progress

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Policy and Economics
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103595
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity, diversity and inclusion in Canada's forest sector labour force: Are we making progress?

Maureen G. Reed, Stephen Wyatt, John Boakye-Danquah
1 citations
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Management and Policy
1.11
article

Equity, diversity and inclusion in Canada's forest sector labour force: Are we making progress?

Maureen G. Reed, Stephen Wyatt, John Boakye-Danquah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Around the world, the labour force supporting commercial forestry has been male-dominated and Canada is no exception. Women, Indigenous Peoples and immigrants in Canada often face systemic barriers such as racism, sexism that result in specific inequalities including income disparities, job segregation, and uneven opportunities for training and mentorship. In response, federal and provincial governments, industry, and educational institutions have introduced policies and taken action to enhance equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in the labour force across multiple sectors. In this paper, we explore Canada's progress in building a diverse and equitable forestry labour force. We analysed data from national forestry strategies (1981–2019), State of Canada's Forests Reports (1990–2023), and the quinquennial national Census (1991–2021), using proxies to examine progress in employment opportunities and representation of three equity-denied groups: women, Indigenous Peoples, and immigrants. Although there are high-level policies for EDI, federal government documents for the forest sector revealed little attention to EDI, with the exception of promoting opportunities for Indigenous workers. Census data show slow and uneven progress with respect to labour force participation, income, and job segregation in forestry. While there is progress in opportunities for Indigenous people, the data show that they still have lower incomes and occupy fewer management positions than others employed in commercial forestry. We reflect on several limitationsin the available data and conclude that if the forest sector in Canada and other similar contexts seeks to advance EDI in its forestry labour force, it must commit to broad motivations for diversity beyond industry competitiveness, set clear targets, introduce new practices, take action and publicly report on the results. • In Canada, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) policies aim to reduce inequities in labour force • National forest sector strategies and reporting are weak are inconsistent on EDI in the labour force. • Census data show that women, Indigenous Peoples, and immigrants are underrepresented in forestry • Availability of data limits the ability to examine progress in EDI • Clear targets and measures and public reporting are needed to advance progress

Forest Policy and EconomicsVol. 179
Université de Moncton (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Natural Resources Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Forest Management and Policy
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.