Fish as indicators of coral reef ecosystem status

• Coral reef fish indicator relationships with reef benthic condition were tested. • Butterflyfish and grouper indicators are positively influenced by high coral cover. • Surgeonfish abundance and length are positively influenced by high turf algae cover. • Parrotfish biomass responds primarily to human gravity not benthic condition. • Most coral reef fish indicators are strongly related to human gravity. Monitoring coral reef health is essential for managing biodiversity and ecosystem services in the face of accelerating environmental change. Here, we assess whether aggregated reef fish indicators at the assemblage and family level can reflect variation in coral reef benthic condition, structural complexity, and human pressure, across 77 sites in the western and central Indian Ocean. Our findings reveal that fish indicators exhibit variable sensitivity and specificity to these ecological gradients. Human gravity was the strongest and most consistent predictor across both assemblage-level and family-level metrics, particularly for biomass and length-based indicators. Mean assemblage trophic level, grouper (Epinephelidae) and butterflyfish (Chaetodontidae) biomass, and surgeonfish (Acanthuridae) abundance were responsive to benthic condition, while grouper length was the most specific indicator of reef structural complexity. In contrast, parrotfish (Scarinae) indicators were not significantly associated with benthic condition, challenging the assumption that they are tightly linked to reef condition or degradation in this region. These results underscore the need for careful selection of fish indicators of coral reef status and demonstrate how family-level indicators can provide specificity in response to pressures that is not captured within aggregate assemblage indicators. We recommend that additional family-level fish indicators of coral reef ecosystem integrity and function be considered within Red List of Ecosystems assessments, and that targeted family-level indicators, such as butterflyfish and grouper biomass for benthic status, grouper length for rugosity and surgeonfish abundance for benthic status, complement existing reef benthic monitoring within global coral reef reporting frameworks such as the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114137
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fish as indicators of coral reef ecosystem status

James Mbugua, David Obura, Ronan Roche, Kennedy Osuka et al.
1 citations
Ecological Indicators
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
1.72
article

Fish as indicators of coral reef ecosystem status

James Mbugua, David Obura, Ronan Roche, Kennedy Osuka, Clare Thouless, Mishal Gudka, Melita Samoilys, Steve Rowlands
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Coral reef fish indicator relationships with reef benthic condition were tested. • Butterflyfish and grouper indicators are positively influenced by high coral cover. • Surgeonfish abundance and length are positively influenced by high turf algae cover. • Parrotfish biomass responds primarily to human gravity not benthic condition. • Most coral reef fish indicators are strongly related to human gravity. Monitoring coral reef health is essential for managing biodiversity and ecosystem services in the face of accelerating environmental change. Here, we assess whether aggregated reef fish indicators at the assemblage and family level can reflect variation in coral reef benthic condition, structural complexity, and human pressure, across 77 sites in the western and central Indian Ocean. Our findings reveal that fish indicators exhibit variable sensitivity and specificity to these ecological gradients. Human gravity was the strongest and most consistent predictor across both assemblage-level and family-level metrics, particularly for biomass and length-based indicators. Mean assemblage trophic level, grouper (Epinephelidae) and butterflyfish (Chaetodontidae) biomass, and surgeonfish (Acanthuridae) abundance were responsive to benthic condition, while grouper length was the most specific indicator of reef structural complexity. In contrast, parrotfish (Scarinae) indicators were not significantly associated with benthic condition, challenging the assumption that they are tightly linked to reef condition or degradation in this region. These results underscore the need for careful selection of fish indicators of coral reef status and demonstrate how family-level indicators can provide specificity in response to pressures that is not captured within aggregate assemblage indicators. We recommend that additional family-level fish indicators of coral reef ecosystem integrity and function be considered within Red List of Ecosystems assessments, and that targeted family-level indicators, such as butterflyfish and grouper biomass for benthic status, grouper length for rugosity and surgeonfish abundance for benthic status, complement existing reef benthic monitoring within global coral reef reporting frameworks such as the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 179
University of Liverpool (GB), Bangor University (GB), Pwani University (KE), Coastal Oceans Research and Development in the Indian Ocean (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.