The Economic Impact of Major Sporting Events: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hosting the Olympic Games

This study conducts a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of hosting the Olympic Games to clarify cost/benefit compositions, key influencing factors, and optimize decision-making for potential host cities. Using literature reviews, case studies (2008 Beijing, 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics, etc.), and quantitative methods (NPV, input-output analysis), the research finds: (1) Costs include direct expenditures (venue construction, event operation, security) and indirect costs (infrastructure upgrades, environmental governance, opportunity costs); (2) Benefits cover direct revenues (tickets, sponsorships, TV rights) and long-term indirect gains (tourism growth, industrial drives, city reputation enhancement); (3) Outcomes vary—Beijing 2008 achieved positive long-term impacts via rational planning, while Rio 2016 faced cost overruns and facility underutilization; (4) Core influencers include pre-existing infrastructure, economic development, and management efficiency. Policy recommendations for cost control (venue reuse, modular construction), benefit maximization (tourism marketing), and sustainability (urban renewal integration) are proposed to enrich sports economics research and guide future hosts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Business Economics and Management
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/d76n0173
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Economic Impact of Major Sporting Events: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hosting the Olympic Games

Pei‐Chann Chang, Farid Uddin Ahmed, Isabelle Houlbert
Frontiers in Business Economics and Management
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

The Economic Impact of Major Sporting Events: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hosting the Olympic Games

Pei‐Chann Chang, Farid Uddin Ahmed, Isabelle Houlbert
article en

Abstract

This study conducts a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of hosting the Olympic Games to clarify cost/benefit compositions, key influencing factors, and optimize decision-making for potential host cities. Using literature reviews, case studies (2008 Beijing, 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics, etc.), and quantitative methods (NPV, input-output analysis), the research finds: (1) Costs include direct expenditures (venue construction, event operation, security) and indirect costs (infrastructure upgrades, environmental governance, opportunity costs); (2) Benefits cover direct revenues (tickets, sponsorships, TV rights) and long-term indirect gains (tourism growth, industrial drives, city reputation enhancement); (3) Outcomes vary—Beijing 2008 achieved positive long-term impacts via rational planning, while Rio 2016 faced cost overruns and facility underutilization; (4) Core influencers include pre-existing infrastructure, economic development, and management efficiency. Policy recommendations for cost control (venue reuse, modular construction), benefit maximization (tourism marketing), and sustainability (urban renewal integration) are proposed to enrich sports economics research and guide future hosts.

Frontiers in Business Economics and ManagementVol. 20(3)
Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.