52 Understanding the impact of visitor restrictions on patient advocacy

<h3></h3> This presentation explores the perspectives of people with lived experience of the impact that COVID-19 visitor restrictions in health services and aged care facilities had on their advocacy and involvement in care planning during the COVID pandemic. Their stories will help delegates to understand the important roles of ‘carer’, essential visitors and the Medical Treatment and Decision Maker hierarchy in supporting patients/residents during major disruptions such as the COVID pandemic. Health service and aged care facilities visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic were implemented to reduce viral spread and to protect vulnerable people and staff, however these restrictions also had negative impacts on patients/residents and carers/families, particularly their role in advocacy. A working party of health service, academic and consumer representatives, was convened to explore the impact of visitor restrictions across a network of 15 regional health and aged care services. The activities of the working party were driven by passionate consumers whose shared experiences and advice led to this co-designed and co-conducted research study. Twenty-eight family/carer stories and ten interviews provided powerful insights into the consumer experience of visitor restrictions during the COVID pandemic. Both positive and negative impacts of visitor restrictions were identified by family/carers, and their stories demonstrate a need for change in the way visitor restrictions are implemented in the future. These stories and interview data reflected a perceived lack of involvement in care and decision making which caused many family members and/or carers to feel that they were not able to advocate on behalf of the patient/resident and that this lack of advocacy had negative impacts on the patient/resident treatment. There is sparse evidence on the impacts of visitor restrictions on family/carer advocacy and involvement in care planning during the COVID pandemic, particularly in rural and regional areas. One of the differentiating features of this work conducted in regional and rural areas of central Victoria is that, unlike most cities in the world, many towns in the region during the first year of the pandemic, did not have a positive case of COVID-19 locally. Therefore there was community backlash about imposing visitor restrictions where it was not perceived by many in the community as a risk. We will share the recommendations that were developed based on lived experience relating to visitor restrictions for health services and aged care facilities in times of escalation in this continuing pandemic, as well as future pandemics or major disruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poster
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-acp.75
Primary Topic
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

52 Understanding the impact of visitor restrictions on patient advocacy

Meagan-Jane Adams, Carol McKinstry, Angela Crombie
Poster
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
article

52 Understanding the impact of visitor restrictions on patient advocacy

Meagan-Jane Adams, Carol McKinstry, Angela Crombie
article en

Abstract

<h3></h3> This presentation explores the perspectives of people with lived experience of the impact that COVID-19 visitor restrictions in health services and aged care facilities had on their advocacy and involvement in care planning during the COVID pandemic. Their stories will help delegates to understand the important roles of ‘carer’, essential visitors and the Medical Treatment and Decision Maker hierarchy in supporting patients/residents during major disruptions such as the COVID pandemic. Health service and aged care facilities visitor restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic were implemented to reduce viral spread and to protect vulnerable people and staff, however these restrictions also had negative impacts on patients/residents and carers/families, particularly their role in advocacy. A working party of health service, academic and consumer representatives, was convened to explore the impact of visitor restrictions across a network of 15 regional health and aged care services. The activities of the working party were driven by passionate consumers whose shared experiences and advice led to this co-designed and co-conducted research study. Twenty-eight family/carer stories and ten interviews provided powerful insights into the consumer experience of visitor restrictions during the COVID pandemic. Both positive and negative impacts of visitor restrictions were identified by family/carers, and their stories demonstrate a need for change in the way visitor restrictions are implemented in the future. These stories and interview data reflected a perceived lack of involvement in care and decision making which caused many family members and/or carers to feel that they were not able to advocate on behalf of the patient/resident and that this lack of advocacy had negative impacts on the patient/resident treatment. There is sparse evidence on the impacts of visitor restrictions on family/carer advocacy and involvement in care planning during the COVID pandemic, particularly in rural and regional areas. One of the differentiating features of this work conducted in regional and rural areas of central Victoria is that, unlike most cities in the world, many towns in the region during the first year of the pandemic, did not have a positive case of COVID-19 locally. Therefore there was community backlash about imposing visitor restrictions where it was not perceived by many in the community as a risk. We will share the recommendations that were developed based on lived experience relating to visitor restrictions for health services and aged care facilities in times of escalation in this continuing pandemic, as well as future pandemics or major disruptions.

Poster
La Trobe University (AU), Bendigo Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.