1232 What are the most common reasons for contacting national ACP advisory service? A mixed-methods study

<h3>Background</h3> Understanding the common reasons why individuals contact the National Advance Care Planning (ACP) Advisory Service is crucial for enhancing service delivery and informing policy, advocacy, and future strategic direction. This study aimed to compare and analyse the nature of inquiries made via calls and emails received from community members and health practitioners over an 18-month period. <h3>Methods</h3> This study employed mixed-methods, concurrent research design. Qualitative data comprised summaries of inbound calls and emails received by the service, with inductive thematic analysis used to develop themes representing reasons for contact. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to quantify inquiry types, types of action or support requested, demographic features, and frequency patterns over time. Comparisons and interpretations from both data forms were made to determine trends and draw conclusions, and identify areas of similarities/differences between community members and health practitioners. <h3>Results</h3> Between October 2023 and March 2025, over 2,553 inquiries were received, with 2,064 calls and 489 emails analysed. Common themes included the need for guidance on ACP process, assistance with completing advance care directives, interstate document recognition, and delivery of ACP education. Health practitioners frequently sought advice around ACP conversations, educational resources and understanding of legislative requirements, while community members primarily sought printed forms, assistance in preparing advance care directives or nominating substitute decision-makers, and in understanding their rights. Descriptive statistical analysis offered insights into gender and geographical distributions across states and territories, with observable peaks in inquiries following targeted promotions and media campaigns related to ACP. The comparison between inquirer groups showed differences in reasons for contact, with community members showing more interest in creating clear instructional directives and practitioners seeking targeted ACP education, obtaining clarity on standards compliance, and navigating ethical dilemmas. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study presents the diverse reasons why individuals contact the service, underlines what is currently occurring in practice, and identifies barriers impacting the uptake of ACP. The findings highlight the need for resources and support mechanisms to address the unique requirements of each group, including advocacy for local services to provide personalised ACP support, development of information factsheets about interstate document recognition, design of targeted ACP education resources, and marketing campaigns and undertaking of systemic policy engagements to overcome identified barriers. More broadly, this study contributes to the evidence base, shaping future policy and systems priorities, that drives Advance Care Planning Australia activities ensuring that the national ACP program is targeted and effective in its implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poster
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-acp.91
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1232 What are the most common reasons for contacting national ACP advisory service? A mixed-methods study

Catherine Joyce, Kylie Ash, Mila Obucina
Poster
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

1232 What are the most common reasons for contacting national ACP advisory service? A mixed-methods study

Catherine Joyce, Kylie Ash, Mila Obucina
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Understanding the common reasons why individuals contact the National Advance Care Planning (ACP) Advisory Service is crucial for enhancing service delivery and informing policy, advocacy, and future strategic direction. This study aimed to compare and analyse the nature of inquiries made via calls and emails received from community members and health practitioners over an 18-month period. <h3>Methods</h3> This study employed mixed-methods, concurrent research design. Qualitative data comprised summaries of inbound calls and emails received by the service, with inductive thematic analysis used to develop themes representing reasons for contact. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to quantify inquiry types, types of action or support requested, demographic features, and frequency patterns over time. Comparisons and interpretations from both data forms were made to determine trends and draw conclusions, and identify areas of similarities/differences between community members and health practitioners. <h3>Results</h3> Between October 2023 and March 2025, over 2,553 inquiries were received, with 2,064 calls and 489 emails analysed. Common themes included the need for guidance on ACP process, assistance with completing advance care directives, interstate document recognition, and delivery of ACP education. Health practitioners frequently sought advice around ACP conversations, educational resources and understanding of legislative requirements, while community members primarily sought printed forms, assistance in preparing advance care directives or nominating substitute decision-makers, and in understanding their rights. Descriptive statistical analysis offered insights into gender and geographical distributions across states and territories, with observable peaks in inquiries following targeted promotions and media campaigns related to ACP. The comparison between inquirer groups showed differences in reasons for contact, with community members showing more interest in creating clear instructional directives and practitioners seeking targeted ACP education, obtaining clarity on standards compliance, and navigating ethical dilemmas. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study presents the diverse reasons why individuals contact the service, underlines what is currently occurring in practice, and identifies barriers impacting the uptake of ACP. The findings highlight the need for resources and support mechanisms to address the unique requirements of each group, including advocacy for local services to provide personalised ACP support, development of information factsheets about interstate document recognition, design of targeted ACP education resources, and marketing campaigns and undertaking of systemic policy engagements to overcome identified barriers. More broadly, this study contributes to the evidence base, shaping future policy and systems priorities, that drives Advance Care Planning Australia activities ensuring that the national ACP program is targeted and effective in its implementation.

Poster
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Family Planning NSW (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.