The Effects of Metalanguage Use on Arabic Grammar Learning and Affective Attitudes of Arabic Learners

This study examines the effects of metalanguage use in Arabic grammar instruction on grammar acquisition and learners’ affective attitudes. Thirty-seven first-year university students were divided into two groups: one received instruction with metalanguage, and the other without. Both groups took a grammar pre-test and post-test, and completed an attitude questionnaire. Results revealed no significant differences in grammar improvement between the groups, though learners expressed mixed perceptions: some found metalanguage helpful for understanding rules, while others—especially lower-proficiency learners—considered it confusing and demotivating. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of metalanguage depends more on learners’ prior knowledge and motivation than on instructional methods, highlighting the need to consider learner backgrounds in Arabic grammar teaching.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Institute of Middle Eastern Affairs
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52891/jmea.2025.24.2.103
Primary Topic
Arabic Language Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Metalanguage Use on Arabic Grammar Learning and Affective Attitudes of Arabic Learners

Ji-Young Mun
The Institute of Middle Eastern Affairs
Arabic Language Education Studies
article

The Effects of Metalanguage Use on Arabic Grammar Learning and Affective Attitudes of Arabic Learners

Ji-Young Mun
article en

Abstract

This study examines the effects of metalanguage use in Arabic grammar instruction on grammar acquisition and learners’ affective attitudes. Thirty-seven first-year university students were divided into two groups: one received instruction with metalanguage, and the other without. Both groups took a grammar pre-test and post-test, and completed an attitude questionnaire. Results revealed no significant differences in grammar improvement between the groups, though learners expressed mixed perceptions: some found metalanguage helpful for understanding rules, while others—especially lower-proficiency learners—considered it confusing and demotivating. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of metalanguage depends more on learners’ prior knowledge and motivation than on instructional methods, highlighting the need to consider learner backgrounds in Arabic grammar teaching.

The Institute of Middle Eastern AffairsVol. 24(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Arabic Language Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.