Lliuya v. rwe: A Leap Forward for Private Climate Litigation?

Abstract This case note examines the judgment issued by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm, Germany, regarding the claim brought by the Peruvian individual Saúl Lliuya against the multinational energy company rwe . It analyses the most noteworthy aspects of the judgment, highlighting causation and the relationship between public and private law. Furthermore, it discusses the implications of the judgment for climate change litigation in Germany and beyond. The case note argues that Lliuya represents a step forward for climate change litigation by determining a legal approach for establishing liability of major emitters for climate change impacts. This notwithstanding, the judgment’s long-term relevance depends on courts drawing inspiration from the approaches advanced in it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate Law
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-bja10065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lliuya v. rwe: A Leap Forward for Private Climate Litigation?

Pablo Pellon Ricciardi
1 citations
Climate Law
Environmental law and policy
15.98
article

Lliuya v. rwe: A Leap Forward for Private Climate Litigation?

Pablo Pellon Ricciardi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This case note examines the judgment issued by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm, Germany, regarding the claim brought by the Peruvian individual Saúl Lliuya against the multinational energy company rwe . It analyses the most noteworthy aspects of the judgment, highlighting causation and the relationship between public and private law. Furthermore, it discusses the implications of the judgment for climate change litigation in Germany and beyond. The case note argues that Lliuya represents a step forward for climate change litigation by determining a legal approach for establishing liability of major emitters for climate change impacts. This notwithstanding, the judgment’s long-term relevance depends on courts drawing inspiration from the approaches advanced in it.

Climate LawVol. 15(1-2)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental law and policy
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.