Leveraging Social Sustainability Disclosure in Financial Institutions: A <scp>ClustOfVar</scp> Approach to Managerial Decision‐Making

ABSTRACT This study investigates how European financial institutions disclose social sustainability information by analyzing the structure and intensity of social reporting within the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. Drawing on a sample of 68 sustainability reports from 2020, covering listed banks and insurance companies, the research adopts a quali‐quantitative approach. In the first phase, a content analysis was conducted using MAXQDA Analytics Pro, enabling the extraction and coding of textual elements associated with 19 GRI social indicators. Disclosure data were systematically identified and transformed into standardized variables through a structured keyword‐based methodology. In the second phase, these variables were analyzed using the ClustOfVar algorithm, which allows for the clustering of mixed‐type data. The results identify six robust and interpretable clusters representing key dimensions of social disclosure: employment and diversity; occupational health and safety; training and human capital development; supplier social assessment; stakeholder and community engagement; and customer data protection. A composite disclosure score was computed for each institution across the clusters, enabling detailed and comparative profiling. The empirical evidence highlights a marked heterogeneity in reporting practices across institutions. While some organizations adopt a comprehensive and multi‐dimensional disclosure strategy, others focus on selected social aspects, suggesting diverse strategic orientations and stakeholder priorities. The findings also reveal thematic areas that are systematically underreported, such as human rights due diligence and supply chain social risks. This study contributes to the literature by providing a replicable quali‐quantitative framework for analyzing social sustainability disclosure. It offers valuable insights for standard setters, financial analysts, and stakeholders aiming to assess the transparency and strategic coherence of social reporting in the financial sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70158
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Social Sustainability Disclosure in Financial Institutions: A ClustOfVar Approach to Managerial Decision‐Making

Carlo Drago, Alberto Manzari, Anna Maria Calce, Loris Di Nallo
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Leveraging Social Sustainability Disclosure in Financial Institutions: A ClustOfVar Approach to Managerial Decision‐Making

Carlo Drago, Alberto Manzari, Anna Maria Calce, Loris Di Nallo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates how European financial institutions disclose social sustainability information by analyzing the structure and intensity of social reporting within the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. Drawing on a sample of 68 sustainability reports from 2020, covering listed banks and insurance companies, the research adopts a quali‐quantitative approach. In the first phase, a content analysis was conducted using MAXQDA Analytics Pro, enabling the extraction and coding of textual elements associated with 19 GRI social indicators. Disclosure data were systematically identified and transformed into standardized variables through a structured keyword‐based methodology. In the second phase, these variables were analyzed using the ClustOfVar algorithm, which allows for the clustering of mixed‐type data. The results identify six robust and interpretable clusters representing key dimensions of social disclosure: employment and diversity; occupational health and safety; training and human capital development; supplier social assessment; stakeholder and community engagement; and customer data protection. A composite disclosure score was computed for each institution across the clusters, enabling detailed and comparative profiling. The empirical evidence highlights a marked heterogeneity in reporting practices across institutions. While some organizations adopt a comprehensive and multi‐dimensional disclosure strategy, others focus on selected social aspects, suggesting diverse strategic orientations and stakeholder priorities. The findings also reveal thematic areas that are systematically underreported, such as human rights due diligence and supply chain social risks. This study contributes to the literature by providing a replicable quali‐quantitative framework for analyzing social sustainability disclosure. It offers valuable insights for standard setters, financial analysts, and stakeholders aiming to assess the transparency and strategic coherence of social reporting in the financial sector.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental ManagementVol. 33(1)
Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (IT), University Niccolò Cusano (IT), Link Campus University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.