Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Pelvi-Acetabular Fractures in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background Pelvi-acetabular fractures can have a profound impact on patient well-being and functional outcomes. Understanding patient-reported outcomes is crucial for assessing the long-term effects of treatment and improving clinical practices. The present study aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in individuals treated for pelvi-acetabular fractures. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital and included patients treated for pelvi-acetabular fractures. Data were collected from patients with a minimum follow-up of six months. Both generic PROMs (Short Form-36 (SF-36), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Oxford Hip Score, and Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score) and functional outcome measures (Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Parker Palmer Mobility Score) were recorded. Radiological assessment was performed using Matta grading. Agreement between the SF-36 and HHS was also evaluated. Results The mean SF-36 physical functioning component score was 92.28. The SMFA showed a mean score of 7.94. HHS results were good in 53.2% of cases and excellent in 38.3% of cases. Overall, the findings revealed favorable outcomes in terms of general health and functional status after treatment. There was significant agreement between the generic PROM (SF-36) and the disease-specific functional outcome measure (HHS), suggesting overall improvement in health and patient satisfaction. Conclusion These findings underscore the importance of comprehensively assessing patient-reported outcomes to capture the full impact of healthcare interventions. The insights from this study may help guide treatment decisions and improve patient satisfaction, particularly in regions with a high incidence of pelvi-acetabular fractures. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is warranted to refine treatment strategies and enhance the quality of care for individuals with pelvi-acetabular injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.91941
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Pelvi-Acetabular Fractures in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital

Sandeep B Rathod, Rehan ul‐Haq, Aditya Aggarwal, Kshitij Malpani
Cureus
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Pelvi-Acetabular Fractures in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital

Sandeep B Rathod, Rehan ul‐Haq, Aditya Aggarwal, Kshitij Malpani
article en

Abstract

Background Pelvi-acetabular fractures can have a profound impact on patient well-being and functional outcomes. Understanding patient-reported outcomes is crucial for assessing the long-term effects of treatment and improving clinical practices. The present study aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in individuals treated for pelvi-acetabular fractures. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital and included patients treated for pelvi-acetabular fractures. Data were collected from patients with a minimum follow-up of six months. Both generic PROMs (Short Form-36 (SF-36), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Oxford Hip Score, and Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score) and functional outcome measures (Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Parker Palmer Mobility Score) were recorded. Radiological assessment was performed using Matta grading. Agreement between the SF-36 and HHS was also evaluated. Results The mean SF-36 physical functioning component score was 92.28. The SMFA showed a mean score of 7.94. HHS results were good in 53.2% of cases and excellent in 38.3% of cases. Overall, the findings revealed favorable outcomes in terms of general health and functional status after treatment. There was significant agreement between the generic PROM (SF-36) and the disease-specific functional outcome measure (HHS), suggesting overall improvement in health and patient satisfaction. Conclusion These findings underscore the importance of comprehensively assessing patient-reported outcomes to capture the full impact of healthcare interventions. The insights from this study may help guide treatment decisions and improve patient satisfaction, particularly in regions with a high incidence of pelvi-acetabular fractures. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods is warranted to refine treatment strategies and enhance the quality of care for individuals with pelvi-acetabular injuries.

CureusVol. 17(9)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Pelvi-Acetabular Fractures in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital — Sandeep B Rathod, Rehan ul‐Haq, et al. · Cureus (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS