<scp>DNA</scp> Divers: Volunteer‐based <scp>eDNA</scp> capture for local and global marine biodiversity monitoring

Abstract Volunteer‐based biodiversity recording is a powerful source of scalable data yet to be used to its full potential by the scientific community. Coastal ecosystems are varied and diverse, making it difficult for managers to identify flexible methods for monitoring biological components. Emerging technologies such as environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis are promising for measuring aquatic biodiversity, yet most management organizations lack personnel and capacity to collect molecular data. Here we investigate, together as professional and non‐professional (citizen) scientists, the efficacy of a quasi‐passive eDNA capture technique. Volunteer SCUBA divers and snorkelers used low‐cost materials, namely cotton medical gauze, to capture eDNA via swimming. We compared this method to conventional eDNA capture techniques in an aquarium and nature, collectively iterating the field and laboratory procedures to improve feasibility. With a small (&lt;30) network of volunteers, we detected 275 unique teleost and elasmobranch taxa, 180 of which could be identified to species level. These detections were from varied marine habitats spanning 90° of latitude, including Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Ocean waters off European, North American, African and Asiatic coasts. The swimming motion of divers was more effective than stationary soaking and the fish communities sampled by divers were comparable to that of conventional eDNA samples. The ease of this technique, matched by the eagerness and generosity of volunteers, presents an untapped, viable approach for scaling multi‐species marine eDNA monitoring as well as an avenue for improving science literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70138
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DNA Divers: Volunteer‐based eDNA capture for local and global marine biodiversity monitoring

Amanda Watson, Erika F. Neave, Sarah Meek, Natasha Yates et al.
2 citations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
3.43
article

DNA Divers: Volunteer‐based eDNA capture for local and global marine biodiversity monitoring

Amanda Watson, Erika F. Neave, Sarah Meek, Natasha Yates, R.T. Allemann, Grant D. Smith, Eric J. Johnson, Rosie Horner, Karen Boswarva, Fiona Crouch, Charlotte E. Bolton, Alice V. Cunnington, Giulia Maiello, Peter Shum, Stefano Mariani, Bob Anderson, Harry J. N. Catherall, Wang Cai, C. Parkes, Wendy Northway, Frederic Bezombes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Volunteer‐based biodiversity recording is a powerful source of scalable data yet to be used to its full potential by the scientific community. Coastal ecosystems are varied and diverse, making it difficult for managers to identify flexible methods for monitoring biological components. Emerging technologies such as environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis are promising for measuring aquatic biodiversity, yet most management organizations lack personnel and capacity to collect molecular data. Here we investigate, together as professional and non‐professional (citizen) scientists, the efficacy of a quasi‐passive eDNA capture technique. Volunteer SCUBA divers and snorkelers used low‐cost materials, namely cotton medical gauze, to capture eDNA via swimming. We compared this method to conventional eDNA capture techniques in an aquarium and nature, collectively iterating the field and laboratory procedures to improve feasibility. With a small (&lt;30) network of volunteers, we detected 275 unique teleost and elasmobranch taxa, 180 of which could be identified to species level. These detections were from varied marine habitats spanning 90° of latitude, including Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Ocean waters off European, North American, African and Asiatic coasts. The swimming motion of divers was more effective than stationary soaking and the fish communities sampled by divers were comparable to that of conventional eDNA samples. The ease of this technique, matched by the eagerness and generosity of volunteers, presents an untapped, viable approach for scaling multi‐species marine eDNA monitoring as well as an avenue for improving science literacy.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(10)
Natural England (GB), Natural History Museum (GB), Blue Planet (Norway) (NO), Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom (GB), Walt Disney (United States) (US), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), Newcastle University (GB), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.