Corn response to sulfur fertilizer rate and source in Illinois

Abstract Sulfur (S) is an essential nutrient for optimizing corn ( Zea mays L.) growth and yield. While S deficiency has increased in recent years, corn response to S fertilizer application remains challenging to predict owing to complex interactions among soil, crop, and weather conditions. Forty field trials were conducted between 2009 and 2011 over a range of soil types and environments to evaluate corn grain yield response to S fertilizer and assess the ability of soil and leaf S concentration to predict yield response to S fertilizer. Rate trials included two (0 and 34 kg S ha −1 ) or five rates (0 to 52 kg S ha −1 , in 13 kg ha −1 increments), whereas S sources were evaluated at 26 kg S ha −1 (ammonium sulfate [21‐0‐0‐24S], elemental S [0‐0‐0‐90S], gypsum [0‐0‐0‐21Ca‐17S], monoammonium phosphate [MAP] MAP‐10S [12‐40‐0‐10S], MAP‐10S+Zn [12‐40‐0‐10S‐1 Zn], and MAP‐15S [13‐33‐0‐15S]). Over the 3‐year study period, we found minimal yield response to S fertilizer application with an overall response rate of 5% (two of 40 trials). In addition, neither S fertilizer evaluated increased corn grain yield relative to no S at any site; however, elemental S significantly reduced yield in one of 18 sites. While S application generally increased soil and earleaf S concentration, this did not translate into yield increases; hence, the lack of relationship between relative yield and soil and earleaf S. Under the study's conditions, these results indicate that S fertilization is unlikely to increase corn yields, and standard diagnostic tests such as soil S and earleaf S concentration are unreliable in predicting yield response in the upper US Midwest. Future research should incorporate other organic and inorganic soil S fractions to improve understanding and prediction of crop response to S fertilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70169
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corn response to sulfur fertilizer rate and source in Illinois

Fabián G. Fernández, John Jones, D. M. Schaefer, Daniel E. Kaiser et al.
Agronomy Journal
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
article

Corn response to sulfur fertilizer rate and source in Illinois

Fabián G. Fernández, John Jones, D. M. Schaefer, Daniel E. Kaiser, Giovani Preza Fontes, Kristin D. Greer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sulfur (S) is an essential nutrient for optimizing corn ( Zea mays L.) growth and yield. While S deficiency has increased in recent years, corn response to S fertilizer application remains challenging to predict owing to complex interactions among soil, crop, and weather conditions. Forty field trials were conducted between 2009 and 2011 over a range of soil types and environments to evaluate corn grain yield response to S fertilizer and assess the ability of soil and leaf S concentration to predict yield response to S fertilizer. Rate trials included two (0 and 34 kg S ha −1 ) or five rates (0 to 52 kg S ha −1 , in 13 kg ha −1 increments), whereas S sources were evaluated at 26 kg S ha −1 (ammonium sulfate [21‐0‐0‐24S], elemental S [0‐0‐0‐90S], gypsum [0‐0‐0‐21Ca‐17S], monoammonium phosphate [MAP] MAP‐10S [12‐40‐0‐10S], MAP‐10S+Zn [12‐40‐0‐10S‐1 Zn], and MAP‐15S [13‐33‐0‐15S]). Over the 3‐year study period, we found minimal yield response to S fertilizer application with an overall response rate of 5% (two of 40 trials). In addition, neither S fertilizer evaluated increased corn grain yield relative to no S at any site; however, elemental S significantly reduced yield in one of 18 sites. While S application generally increased soil and earleaf S concentration, this did not translate into yield increases; hence, the lack of relationship between relative yield and soil and earleaf S. Under the study's conditions, these results indicate that S fertilization is unlikely to increase corn yields, and standard diagnostic tests such as soil S and earleaf S concentration are unreliable in predicting yield response in the upper US Midwest. Future research should incorporate other organic and inorganic soil S fractions to improve understanding and prediction of crop response to S fertilization.

Agronomy JournalVol. 117(5)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Fertility Centers of Illinois (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Illinois Nutrient Research and Education Council, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.