Normality and Disability in Para Sport and Their Application in the International Paralympic Committee Handbook: A Philosophical Critique

This article critically examines the concepts of “normality” and “disability” within the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) Handbook, highlighting their implications for Para sport and athletes with disabilities. The analysis explores how these ideas shape public perceptions, the role of technology in Para sport, and the IPC’s dual focus on elite competition and social development. Through a philosophical and multidisciplinary lens, the research identifies tensions and inconsistencies in the language and models of disability used by the IPC. Historical, social, and cultural narratives are considered to contextualize the Handbook’s construction. Recommendations are made for policy improvements to better align the IPC’s policies with its vision of inclusivity and social change through Para sport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quest
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2025.2554630
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normality and Disability in Para Sport and Their Application in the International Paralympic Committee Handbook: A Philosophical Critique

Mike McNamee, Danielle Mercado
Quest
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Normality and Disability in Para Sport and Their Application in the International Paralympic Committee Handbook: A Philosophical Critique

Mike McNamee, Danielle Mercado
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the concepts of “normality” and “disability” within the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) Handbook, highlighting their implications for Para sport and athletes with disabilities. The analysis explores how these ideas shape public perceptions, the role of technology in Para sport, and the IPC’s dual focus on elite competition and social development. Through a philosophical and multidisciplinary lens, the research identifies tensions and inconsistencies in the language and models of disability used by the IPC. Historical, social, and cultural narratives are considered to contextualize the Handbook’s construction. Recommendations are made for policy improvements to better align the IPC’s policies with its vision of inclusivity and social change through Para sport.

QuestVol. 78(1)
Swansea University (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.