Beyond disenfranchized grief: Survey and interview accounts of animal loss through and beyond COVID-19 in the United Kingdom

Although there was a rapidly growing body of literature on human-animal relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic, little attention was given to accounts of animal death through and beyond COVID-19. This paper reports on two connected studies undertaken after the end of COVID-19 restrictions in the United Kingdom, here focusing specifically on animal companion loss. From an online survey of 667 participants, 354 responded to an open-ended question about the loss of an animal. Content analysis of these data found participants commented about the timing of loss, how the loss occurred, and how they framed or accounted for the loss. From online interviews with 41 participants, 36 spoke about the loss of an animal. Themes of anticipatory grief, pandemic loss, and depth of connection were generated. The paper concludes by reconceptualizing animal bereavement to decenter human exceptionalism, and how this could further normalize the significance of animal loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Death Studies
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2557716
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond disenfranchized grief: Survey and interview accounts of animal loss through and beyond COVID-19 in the United Kingdom

Damien W. Riggs, Elizabeth Peel
2 citations
Death Studies
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
3.63
article

Beyond disenfranchized grief: Survey and interview accounts of animal loss through and beyond COVID-19 in the United Kingdom

Damien W. Riggs, Elizabeth Peel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Although there was a rapidly growing body of literature on human-animal relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic, little attention was given to accounts of animal death through and beyond COVID-19. This paper reports on two connected studies undertaken after the end of COVID-19 restrictions in the United Kingdom, here focusing specifically on animal companion loss. From an online survey of 667 participants, 354 responded to an open-ended question about the loss of an animal. Content analysis of these data found participants commented about the timing of loss, how the loss occurred, and how they framed or accounted for the loss. From online interviews with 41 participants, 36 spoke about the loss of an animal. Themes of anticipatory grief, pandemic loss, and depth of connection were generated. The paper concludes by reconceptualizing animal bereavement to decenter human exceptionalism, and how this could further normalize the significance of animal loss.

Death Studies
Loughborough University (GB), Flinders University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond disenfranchized grief: Survey and interview accounts of animal loss through and beyond COVID-19 in the United Kingdom — Damien W. Riggs, Elizabeth Peel · Death Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS