Risk score roulette: A cautionary tale of polygenic risk score reliability
Genetic risk prediction for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has high potential impact, yet few studies have assessed the reliability of various polygenic risk score (PRS) methods at the individual level. Here, we evaluated the reliability of AD PRS estimates among 6338 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. We compared four PRS models that have been previously associated with dementia risk. Despite similar population-level performance metrics, inter-model reliability of individual-level risk assessment was low, even among individuals classified in the top and bottom deciles. These findings raise serious concerns about the downstream application of PRS for guiding interventions for AD.
Authors
- Elizabeth Blue (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0633-0305)
- Alexis C. Wood (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-2119)
- Diane Xue (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-2253)
- Alison E. Fohner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4231-3331)
- Jerome I. Rotter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-1723)
Institutions
- University of Washington (US)
- UCLA Medical Center (US)
- University of Washington Medical Center (US)
- Brotman Baty Institute (US)
- Children's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
- Published
- 2025-09-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251375098
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.82