Ethical Controversies in the Adriana Smith Case in Georgia: Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pregnancy
This manuscript explores the myriad ethical controversies associated with declaration of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) during pregnancy raised by the case of Ms. Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old Georgia nurse, who came to international attention in May 2025. We will discuss: (1) the factors that may have impacted the decision not to perform neuroimaging when she first presented to medical attention; (2) the significance of identifying and deferring performance of futile interventions to decrease intracranial pressure relative to BD/DNC declaration; (3) the medical, ethical and legal complexities associated with BD/DNC declaration and continuation of maternal organ support in pregnancy; (4) the impact of continuing maternal organ support after BD/DNC declaration on the fetus, the family, Ms. Smith and the treatment team; and (5) the effects of media coverage of this case. This case's influence on future BD/DNC declarations during pregnancy, both in Georgia and elsewhere, remains to be seen.
Authors
- Ariane Lewis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-7320)
- Kimberly M. Mutcherson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5388-3404)
- Gwendolyn P. Quinn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4208-9889)
Institutions
- Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
- New York University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The American Journal of Bioethics
- Published
- 2025-09-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2025.2554796
- Citations
- 13
- Primary Topic
- Organ Donation and Transplantation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 24.42