Ethical Controversies in the Adriana Smith Case in Georgia: Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pregnancy

This manuscript explores the myriad ethical controversies associated with declaration of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) during pregnancy raised by the case of Ms. Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old Georgia nurse, who came to international attention in May 2025. We will discuss: (1) the factors that may have impacted the decision not to perform neuroimaging when she first presented to medical attention; (2) the significance of identifying and deferring performance of futile interventions to decrease intracranial pressure relative to BD/DNC declaration; (3) the medical, ethical and legal complexities associated with BD/DNC declaration and continuation of maternal organ support in pregnancy; (4) the impact of continuing maternal organ support after BD/DNC declaration on the fetus, the family, Ms. Smith and the treatment team; and (5) the effects of media coverage of this case. This case's influence on future BD/DNC declarations during pregnancy, both in Georgia and elsewhere, remains to be seen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Bioethics
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2025.2554796
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Controversies in the Adriana Smith Case in Georgia: Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pregnancy

Ariane Lewis, Kimberly M. Mutcherson, Gwendolyn P. Quinn
13 citations
The American Journal of Bioethics
Organ Donation and Transplantation
24.42
article

Ethical Controversies in the Adriana Smith Case in Georgia: Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pregnancy

Ariane Lewis, Kimberly M. Mutcherson, Gwendolyn P. Quinn
article en
13 citations

Abstract

This manuscript explores the myriad ethical controversies associated with declaration of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) during pregnancy raised by the case of Ms. Adriana Smith, a 30-year-old Georgia nurse, who came to international attention in May 2025. We will discuss: (1) the factors that may have impacted the decision not to perform neuroimaging when she first presented to medical attention; (2) the significance of identifying and deferring performance of futile interventions to decrease intracranial pressure relative to BD/DNC declaration; (3) the medical, ethical and legal complexities associated with BD/DNC declaration and continuation of maternal organ support in pregnancy; (4) the impact of continuing maternal organ support after BD/DNC declaration on the fetus, the family, Ms. Smith and the treatment team; and (5) the effects of media coverage of this case. This case's influence on future BD/DNC declarations during pregnancy, both in Georgia and elsewhere, remains to be seen.

The American Journal of BioethicsVol. 26(1)
Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
24.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical Controversies in the Adriana Smith Case in Georgia: Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pregnancy — Ariane Lewis, Kimberly M. Mutcherson, et al. · The American Journal of Bioethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS