Measurement requires compromises: the case of economic inequality

We examine considerations that enter into design and evaluation of measures in social science, categorizing them into four drivers: epistemic, ethical, pragmatic, and metrological. We call them drivers to highlight their role in guiding researchers' decisions without determining them. Through an analysis of the World Inequality Report 2022, we reveal tensions among these drivers, illustrating the complex interplay between the various demands a measure must satisfy. Our analysis highlights the need for case-by-case compromises to address these tensions, as optimizing one driver often comes at the expense of another. We explore the extent to which these compromises shape measurement practice and the principles that guide researchers in balancing them. While existing literature on measurement assumes that tensions can be resolved with good practice and use, we argue that developing a good measure requires balancing multiple demands, recognising that it might be impossible to meet all of them simultaneously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement requires compromises: the case of economic inequality

Anna Alexandrova, Alessandra Basso
1 citations
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
4.20
article

Measurement requires compromises: the case of economic inequality

Anna Alexandrova, Alessandra Basso
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We examine considerations that enter into design and evaluation of measures in social science, categorizing them into four drivers: epistemic, ethical, pragmatic, and metrological. We call them drivers to highlight their role in guiding researchers' decisions without determining them. Through an analysis of the World Inequality Report 2022, we reveal tensions among these drivers, illustrating the complex interplay between the various demands a measure must satisfy. Our analysis highlights the need for case-by-case compromises to address these tensions, as optimizing one driver often comes at the expense of another. We explore the extent to which these compromises shape measurement practice and the principles that guide researchers in balancing them. While existing literature on measurement assumes that tensions can be resolved with good practice and use, we argue that developing a good measure requires balancing multiple demands, recognising that it might be impossible to meet all of them simultaneously.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part AVol. 113
University of Cambridge (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
British Academy, Isaac Newton Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measurement requires compromises: the case of economic inequality — Anna Alexandrova, Alessandra Basso · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS