Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsA total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study and randomly allocated to two groups (research registry number: 11353). On the first day after abdominal closure, routine treatment was performed in the non-HIPEC group, whereas HIPEC was performed in the HIPEC group. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival, side effects, and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe basic information of the patients showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from surgery to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal pain, bleeding, leakage, or other blood indices between the two groups (p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05); however, the symptoms of ileus and pelvic abscess appeared more frequently in the non-HIPEC group (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05). HIPEC, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and vascular invasion were significant indicators, while HIPEC, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage, and T stage were independent prognostic factors. The 3-year survival rate of the HIPEC group (42%) was higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (21%) (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.001). The progression-free survival curve of the HIPEC group was superior to that of the non-HIPEC group (p<i> < </i>0.001), and the recurrence rate of the HIPEC group (25%) was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group (49%) (p<i> < </i>0.001).ConclusionsHIPEC can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess, and the overall survival and progression-free survival curves were better in the HIPEC group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Medical Research
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251372415
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients

Ting Liu, Changhui Li, Hong Chen, Chang Yanan et al.
1 links
Journal of International Medical Research
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

Efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients

Ting Liu, Changhui Li, Hong Chen, Chang Yanan, Xu Yaxin
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsA total of 200 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study and randomly allocated to two groups (research registry number: 11353). On the first day after abdominal closure, routine treatment was performed in the non-HIPEC group, whereas HIPEC was performed in the HIPEC group. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival, side effects, and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors for overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed.ResultsThe basic information of the patients showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the time from surgery to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal pain, bleeding, leakage, or other blood indices between the two groups (p<i> </i>><i> </i>0.05); however, the symptoms of ileus and pelvic abscess appeared more frequently in the non-HIPEC group (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.05). HIPEC, tumor size, N stage, T stage, and vascular invasion were significant indicators, while HIPEC, tumor size, vascular invasion, N stage, and T stage were independent prognostic factors. The 3-year survival rate of the HIPEC group (42%) was higher than that of the non-HIPEC group (21%) (p<i> </i><<i> </i>0.001). The progression-free survival curve of the HIPEC group was superior to that of the non-HIPEC group (p<i> < </i>0.001), and the recurrence rate of the HIPEC group (25%) was lower than that of the non-HIPEC group (49%) (p<i> < </i>0.001).ConclusionsHIPEC can reduce the possibility of perioperative complications such as intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess, and the overall survival and progression-free survival curves were better in the HIPEC group.

Journal of International Medical ResearchVol. 53(9)
Wuhan University (CN), Shanghai Ship and Shipping Research Institute (CN), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN), Dongguan People’s Hospital (CN), Hubei Provincial Women and Children's Hospital (CN), Fifth Hospital In Wuhan (CN), Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.