Patients as partners in medical publications: the ISMPP journey of engagement

Patient engagement (PE) has evolved from an emerging concept to a fundamental ethos underpinning healthcare research and communication. In this commentary, we explore the historical evolution in medical research from patients being participants in clinical trials to becoming integral partners in communicating medical research findings. The progression from "why" to "how" PE should occur represents a fundamental shift in the medical publication landscape. We also highlight the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals' (ISMPP) journey in embracing and advancing PE within medical publications through ISMPP's initiatives and activities, including the establishment of its PE Task Force, patient membership, and support programs, while examining the cultural transformations occurring within the profession. Looking ahead, we discuss opportunities for expanding patient roles, improving accessibility to tools and frameworks, and integrating patient perspectives into leadership positions. This commentary serves as both a reflective narrative and a call to action for medical publication professionals to champion authentic and meaningful PE, ensuring publications truly engage and serve the patients at the heart of the research they describe, as exemplified by ISMPP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2556317
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients as partners in medical publications: the ISMPP journey of engagement

Anna B. Geraci, Nichola Gokool, Robert J. Matheis, Catherine Skobe et al.
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Patients as partners in medical publications: the ISMPP journey of engagement

Anna B. Geraci, Nichola Gokool, Robert J. Matheis, Catherine Skobe, Trishna Bharadia, Simon Stones, Dawn Lobban
article en

Abstract

Patient engagement (PE) has evolved from an emerging concept to a fundamental ethos underpinning healthcare research and communication. In this commentary, we explore the historical evolution in medical research from patients being participants in clinical trials to becoming integral partners in communicating medical research findings. The progression from "why" to "how" PE should occur represents a fundamental shift in the medical publication landscape. We also highlight the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals' (ISMPP) journey in embracing and advancing PE within medical publications through ISMPP's initiatives and activities, including the establishment of its PE Task Force, patient membership, and support programs, while examining the cultural transformations occurring within the profession. Looking ahead, we discuss opportunities for expanding patient roles, improving accessibility to tools and frameworks, and integrating patient perspectives into leadership positions. This commentary serves as both a reflective narrative and a call to action for medical publication professionals to champion authentic and meaningful PE, ensuring publications truly engage and serve the patients at the heart of the research they describe, as exemplified by ISMPP.

Current Medical Research and OpinionVol. 41(8)
PAREXEL International (United Kingdom) (GB), Pfizer (United States) (US), Buckinghamshire New University (GB), Spark Therapeutics (United States) (US), Sparks (GB), Applied Scientific Research (United States) (US), PAREXEL International (United States) (US), European League Against Rheumatism (CH), American Society for Clinical Pathology (US), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.