Phasic Alertness Impairs Cognitive Control by Amplifying Competition between Evidence Accumulators
Although phasic alertness generally benefits cognitive performance, it often increases the impact of distracting information, resulting in impaired decision-making and cognitive control. However, it is unclear why phasic alertness has these negative effects. Here, we present a novel, biologically informed account, according to which phasic alertness generates a transient, evidence-independent input (TEI) to the decision process. This shortens overall response times but also amplifies competition between evidence accumulators, thus slowing down decision-making and impairing cognitive control. The key hypotheses of this account are supported with pupil measurements and electrophysiological data from human decision-makers of either sex performing an arrow flanker task. We also show that a computational model of the flanker task that incorporates a TEI can reproduce the behavioral effects of phasic alertness but only when the evidence accumulators compete with each other through lateral inhibition. Our results reveal a close interplay between dynamic changes in alertness, cognitive control, and evidence accumulation.
Authors
- Franz Wurm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5843-9265)
- Roy de Kleijn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1759-3960)
- Jeshua Tromp (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-6076)
- Federica Lucchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2171-3210)
- Sander Nieuwenhuis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2418-3879)
Institutions
- Leiden University (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Published
- 2025-09-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1595-24.2025
- Primary Topic
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00