Phasic Alertness Impairs Cognitive Control by Amplifying Competition between Evidence Accumulators

Although phasic alertness generally benefits cognitive performance, it often increases the impact of distracting information, resulting in impaired decision-making and cognitive control. However, it is unclear why phasic alertness has these negative effects. Here, we present a novel, biologically informed account, according to which phasic alertness generates a transient, evidence-independent input (TEI) to the decision process. This shortens overall response times but also amplifies competition between evidence accumulators, thus slowing down decision-making and impairing cognitive control. The key hypotheses of this account are supported with pupil measurements and electrophysiological data from human decision-makers of either sex performing an arrow flanker task. We also show that a computational model of the flanker task that incorporates a TEI can reproduce the behavioral effects of phasic alertness but only when the evidence accumulators compete with each other through lateral inhibition. Our results reveal a close interplay between dynamic changes in alertness, cognitive control, and evidence accumulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1595-24.2025
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phasic Alertness Impairs Cognitive Control by Amplifying Competition between Evidence Accumulators

Franz Wurm, Roy de Kleijn, Jeshua Tromp, Federica Lucchi et al.
Journal of Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Phasic Alertness Impairs Cognitive Control by Amplifying Competition between Evidence Accumulators

Franz Wurm, Roy de Kleijn, Jeshua Tromp, Federica Lucchi, Sander Nieuwenhuis
article en

Abstract

Although phasic alertness generally benefits cognitive performance, it often increases the impact of distracting information, resulting in impaired decision-making and cognitive control. However, it is unclear why phasic alertness has these negative effects. Here, we present a novel, biologically informed account, according to which phasic alertness generates a transient, evidence-independent input (TEI) to the decision process. This shortens overall response times but also amplifies competition between evidence accumulators, thus slowing down decision-making and impairing cognitive control. The key hypotheses of this account are supported with pupil measurements and electrophysiological data from human decision-makers of either sex performing an arrow flanker task. We also show that a computational model of the flanker task that incorporates a TEI can reproduce the behavioral effects of phasic alertness but only when the evidence accumulators compete with each other through lateral inhibition. Our results reveal a close interplay between dynamic changes in alertness, cognitive control, and evidence accumulation.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 45(42)
Leiden University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.