Drought stress differentially influences growth, physiology, and metabolite accumulation in Triticum aestivum (C3) and Amaranthus caudatus (C4) plants

Drought stress affects plant growth and production. To cope with drought stress, plants induced physiological and metabolic changes, serving as a protective approach under drought-stress conditions. The response to drought can vary based on plant type (C3 vs. C4) and the intensity of the stress. Therefore, here we aimed to investigate the different responses of wheat C3-Triticum aestivum and C4-Amaranthus caudatus plants to drought stress. To this end, the growth, photosynthetic parameters, oxidative stress, total antioxidant capacity, primary metabolites (amino acids and organic and fatty acids) and secondary metabolites (polyamines) were analyzed. Drought stress reduced growth, biomass, relative water content, water potential, and photosynthesis in both plants, with more severe effects observed in wheat. Drought-induced reduction in photosynthesis was linked to lower stomatal conductance, reduced photosynthetic enzyme activity, and decreased Fv/Fm, indicating impaired PSII function, effects that were more pronounced in wheat than in amaranth. This was accompanied by increased oxidative damage, as indicated by elevated levels of lipid peroxidation. To cope with drought stress, both plants accumulated metabolites involved in antioxidant defense and osmoregulation, including total antioxidant capacity, soluble sugars, proline, polyamines, organic acids, and fatty acids. This response was more pronounced in wheat, indicating its active deployment of defenses to cope with significant stress, in contrast to Amaranthus' greater physiological resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Plant Biology
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07022-7
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drought stress differentially influences growth, physiology, and metabolite accumulation in Triticum aestivum (C3) and Amaranthus caudatus (C4) plants

Seham M. Hamed, Emad A. Alsherif, Shereen Magdy Korany, Samy Selim et al.
10 citations
BMC Plant Biology
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
17.50
article

Drought stress differentially influences growth, physiology, and metabolite accumulation in Triticum aestivum (C3) and Amaranthus caudatus (C4) plants

Seham M. Hamed, Emad A. Alsherif, Shereen Magdy Korany, Samy Selim, María Gabriela Maridueña-Zavala, Maha H. Khalaf, Soad K. Al Jaouni, Abeer S. Aloufi, Galal Khamis, Danyah A. Aldailami
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Drought stress affects plant growth and production. To cope with drought stress, plants induced physiological and metabolic changes, serving as a protective approach under drought-stress conditions. The response to drought can vary based on plant type (C3 vs. C4) and the intensity of the stress. Therefore, here we aimed to investigate the different responses of wheat C3-Triticum aestivum and C4-Amaranthus caudatus plants to drought stress. To this end, the growth, photosynthetic parameters, oxidative stress, total antioxidant capacity, primary metabolites (amino acids and organic and fatty acids) and secondary metabolites (polyamines) were analyzed. Drought stress reduced growth, biomass, relative water content, water potential, and photosynthesis in both plants, with more severe effects observed in wheat. Drought-induced reduction in photosynthesis was linked to lower stomatal conductance, reduced photosynthetic enzyme activity, and decreased Fv/Fm, indicating impaired PSII function, effects that were more pronounced in wheat than in amaranth. This was accompanied by increased oxidative damage, as indicated by elevated levels of lipid peroxidation. To cope with drought stress, both plants accumulated metabolites involved in antioxidant defense and osmoregulation, including total antioxidant capacity, soluble sugars, proline, polyamines, organic acids, and fatty acids. This response was more pronounced in wheat, indicating its active deployment of defenses to cope with significant stress, in contrast to Amaranthus' greater physiological resilience.

BMC Plant BiologyVol. 25(1)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Beni-Suef University (EG), Saudi Electronic University (SA), Cairo University (EG), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Jouf University (SA), Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA)
Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
17.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.