Senescence Under the Lens: X-ray vs. Proton Irradiation at Conventional and Ultra-High Dose Rate

Conventional radiotherapy based on X rays is used to treat more than 50% of cancers. Although effective, radiotherapy can damage healthy tissues around the tumor due to the X-ray dose deposition profile, as well as the safety margin needed to compensate for dose uncertainties. A notable side effect is cellular senescence, characterized by the cessation of cell division while maintaining metabolic activity and promoting the secretion of various components, called the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. To minimize toxicity in healthy tissues, proton therapy holds great promise as it enables tumors to be targeted more precisely while sparing healthy tissues beyond the tumor site. Another innovative method is ultra-high dose rate irradiation, which seems to induce less damage to healthy tissues while generating an anti-tumor response similar to standard dose rate irradiation. In this work, we aimed to compare the effects of X rays and protons at conventional dose rate (2 Gy/min) and ultra-high dose rate (454 Gy/s), on the induction of senescence in primary normal human dermal fibroblasts by analyzing several senescence biomarkers. Irradiation with ultra-high dose rate protons caused more pronounced cellular and nuclear morphological changes in normal human dermal fibroblasts than irradiation with conventional protons or X-rays. For other biomarkers, all three types of irradiations induced an increase in the proportion of senescence-associated beta-gal-positive cells, an irreversible cell cycle arrest and an accumulation of unrepaired DNA damage, but did not affect senescence-associated secretory phenotype.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Research
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1667/rade-25-00071.1
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Senescence Under the Lens: X-ray vs. Proton Irradiation at Conventional and Ultra-High Dose Rate

Carine Michiels, H. E. Paulus, Florence Debacq‐Chainiaux, Anne‐Catherine Heuskin et al.
Radiation Research
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Senescence Under the Lens: X-ray vs. Proton Irradiation at Conventional and Ultra-High Dose Rate

Carine Michiels, H. E. Paulus, Florence Debacq‐Chainiaux, Anne‐Catherine Heuskin, Marie-Eugénie De Meester
article en

Abstract

Conventional radiotherapy based on X rays is used to treat more than 50% of cancers. Although effective, radiotherapy can damage healthy tissues around the tumor due to the X-ray dose deposition profile, as well as the safety margin needed to compensate for dose uncertainties. A notable side effect is cellular senescence, characterized by the cessation of cell division while maintaining metabolic activity and promoting the secretion of various components, called the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. To minimize toxicity in healthy tissues, proton therapy holds great promise as it enables tumors to be targeted more precisely while sparing healthy tissues beyond the tumor site. Another innovative method is ultra-high dose rate irradiation, which seems to induce less damage to healthy tissues while generating an anti-tumor response similar to standard dose rate irradiation. In this work, we aimed to compare the effects of X rays and protons at conventional dose rate (2 Gy/min) and ultra-high dose rate (454 Gy/s), on the induction of senescence in primary normal human dermal fibroblasts by analyzing several senescence biomarkers. Irradiation with ultra-high dose rate protons caused more pronounced cellular and nuclear morphological changes in normal human dermal fibroblasts than irradiation with conventional protons or X-rays. For other biomarkers, all three types of irradiations induced an increase in the proportion of senescence-associated beta-gal-positive cells, an irreversible cell cycle arrest and an accumulation of unrepaired DNA damage, but did not affect senescence-associated secretory phenotype.

Radiation ResearchVol. 204(5)
University of Namur (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Senescence Under the Lens: X-ray vs. Proton Irradiation at Conventional and Ultra-High Dose Rate — Carine Michiels, H. E. Paulus, et al. · Radiation Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS