Binocular cues to 3D face structure increase activation in depth-selective visual cortex with negligible effects in face-selective areas

Studies of visual face processing often use flat images as proxies for real faces due to their ease of manipulation and experimental control. Although flat images capture many features of a face, they lack the rich three-dimensional (3D) structural information available when binocularly viewing real faces (e.g., binocular cues to a long nose). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the contribution of naturalistic binocular depth information to univariate activation levels and multivariate activation patterns in depth- and face-selective human brain regions. We used two cameras to capture images of real people from the viewpoints of the two eyes. These images were presented with natural viewing geometry (such that the size, distance, and binocular disparities were comparable to a real face at a typical viewing distance). Participants viewed stereopairs under four conditions: accurate binocular disparity (3D), zero binocular disparity (two-dimensional [2D]), reversed binocular disparity (pseudoscopic 3D), and no binocular disparity (monocular 2D). Although 3D faces (both 3D and pseudoscopic 3D) elicited higher activation levels than 2D faces, as well as distinct activation patterns, in depth-selective occipitoparietal regions (V3A, V3B, IPS0, IPS1, hMT+), face-selective occipitotemporal regions (OFA, FFA, pSTS) showed limited sensitivity to internal facial disparities. These results suggest that 2D images are a reasonable proxy for studying the neural basis of face recognition in face-selective regions, although contributions from 3D structural processing within the dorsal visual stream warrant further consideration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.11.6
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binocular cues to 3D face structure increase activation in depth-selective visual cortex with negligible effects in face-selective areas

Karsten Babin, Jody C. Culham, Carol Coricelli, Chelsea Ekstrand et al.
Journal of Vision
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Binocular cues to 3D face structure increase activation in depth-selective visual cortex with negligible effects in face-selective areas

Karsten Babin, Jody C. Culham, Carol Coricelli, Chelsea Ekstrand, Kevin Stubbs, Laurie M. Wilcox, Eva Deligiannis, Marisa Donnelly
article en

Abstract

Studies of visual face processing often use flat images as proxies for real faces due to their ease of manipulation and experimental control. Although flat images capture many features of a face, they lack the rich three-dimensional (3D) structural information available when binocularly viewing real faces (e.g., binocular cues to a long nose). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the contribution of naturalistic binocular depth information to univariate activation levels and multivariate activation patterns in depth- and face-selective human brain regions. We used two cameras to capture images of real people from the viewpoints of the two eyes. These images were presented with natural viewing geometry (such that the size, distance, and binocular disparities were comparable to a real face at a typical viewing distance). Participants viewed stereopairs under four conditions: accurate binocular disparity (3D), zero binocular disparity (two-dimensional [2D]), reversed binocular disparity (pseudoscopic 3D), and no binocular disparity (monocular 2D). Although 3D faces (both 3D and pseudoscopic 3D) elicited higher activation levels than 2D faces, as well as distinct activation patterns, in depth-selective occipitoparietal regions (V3A, V3B, IPS0, IPS1, hMT+), face-selective occipitotemporal regions (OFA, FFA, pSTS) showed limited sensitivity to internal facial disparities. These results suggest that 2D images are a reasonable proxy for studying the neural basis of face recognition in face-selective regions, although contributions from 3D structural processing within the dorsal visual stream warrant further consideration.

Journal of VisionVol. 25(11)
University of Lethbridge (CA), Western University (CA), Goethe-Institute United Kingdom (GB), York University (CA), Karelia University of Applied Sciences (FI), Laboratoire Jean-Alexandre Dieudonné (FR), FuelCell Energy (United States) (US), ORCID (US), Lymphoma Study Association (FR), CAO Group (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.