The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Revisiting past experience

Abstract In 2024, the UK House of Commons established a new ‘Modernisation Committee’, modelled on a previous 1997–2010 committee of the same name. This article revisits the record of that earlier committee, to re-examine a series of prominent claims about its work from existing literature. We make several new contributions by developing quantitative indicators of various aspects of the committee’s work, studying the full lifetime of the committee, and comparing it to the Commons’ other main vehicle for developing procedural reforms, the Procedure Committee. Our evidence echoes some previous claims about the Modernisation Committee’s successes, but suggests that some past criticisms of its record could also be levelled at the Procedure Committee. We thus shed new light on past procedural reform efforts at Westminster, and provide fresh context for the approach (re-)adopted in 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaf045
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Revisiting past experience

Thomas G. Fleming, Henry Ansgar Kelly
Parliamentary Affairs
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Revisiting past experience

Thomas G. Fleming, Henry Ansgar Kelly
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 2024, the UK House of Commons established a new ‘Modernisation Committee’, modelled on a previous 1997–2010 committee of the same name. This article revisits the record of that earlier committee, to re-examine a series of prominent claims about its work from existing literature. We make several new contributions by developing quantitative indicators of various aspects of the committee’s work, studying the full lifetime of the committee, and comparing it to the Commons’ other main vehicle for developing procedural reforms, the Procedure Committee. Our evidence echoes some previous claims about the Modernisation Committee’s successes, but suggests that some past criticisms of its record could also be levelled at the Procedure Committee. We thus shed new light on past procedural reform efforts at Westminster, and provide fresh context for the approach (re-)adopted in 2024.

Parliamentary Affairs
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Revisiting past experience — Thomas G. Fleming, Henry Ansgar Kelly · Parliamentary Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS