Computational Complexity of Unitary and State Design Properties

We investigate unitary and state <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>t</a:mi></a:math>-designs from a computational complexity perspective. First, we address the problems of computing frame potentials that characterize (approximate) <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>t</c:mi></c:math>-designs. We present a quantum algorithm for computing frame potentials and establish the following: (1) exact computation can be achieved by a single query to a <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:mi mathvariant="normal">#</e:mi><e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</e:mi></e:mrow></e:mrow></e:mrow></e:mrow></e:math> oracle and is <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mrow><i:mi mathvariant="normal">#</i:mi><i:mrow><i:mrow><i:mrow><i:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</i:mi></i:mrow></i:mrow></i:mrow></i:mrow></i:math>-hard; (2) for state vectors, deciding whether the frame potential is larger than or smaller than certain values is <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">B</m:mi><m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Q</m:mi><m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</m:mi></m:mrow></m:mrow></m:mrow></m:math>-complete, provided that the promise gap between the two values is inverse polynomial in the number of qubits; and (3) for both state vectors and unitaries, this promise problem is <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mrow><r:mrow><r:mrow><r:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</r:mi><r:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</r:mi></r:mrow></r:mrow></r:mrow></r:math>-complete if the promise gap is exponentially small. Second, we address the promise problem of deciding whether or not a given set is a good approximation to a design. Given a certain promise gap that could be constant, we show that this problem is <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mrow><v:mrow><v:mrow><v:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</v:mi><v:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</v:mi></v:mrow></v:mrow></v:mrow></v:math>-hard, highlighting the inherent computational difficulty of determining properties of unitary and state designs. We further identify implications of our results, including variational methods for constructing designs, diagnosing quantum chaos, and exploring emergent designs in Hamiltonian systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PRX Quantum
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/21vm-bz3t
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational Complexity of Unitary and State Design Properties

Yoshifumi Nakata, Martin Kliesch, Yuki Takeuchi, Andrew S. Darmawan
PRX Quantum
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Computational Complexity of Unitary and State Design Properties

Yoshifumi Nakata, Martin Kliesch, Yuki Takeuchi, Andrew S. Darmawan
article en

Abstract

We investigate unitary and state <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>t</a:mi></a:math>-designs from a computational complexity perspective. First, we address the problems of computing frame potentials that characterize (approximate) <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mi>t</c:mi></c:math>-designs. We present a quantum algorithm for computing frame potentials and establish the following: (1) exact computation can be achieved by a single query to a <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mrow><e:mi mathvariant="normal">#</e:mi><e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mrow><e:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</e:mi></e:mrow></e:mrow></e:mrow></e:mrow></e:math> oracle and is <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mrow><i:mi mathvariant="normal">#</i:mi><i:mrow><i:mrow><i:mrow><i:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</i:mi></i:mrow></i:mrow></i:mrow></i:mrow></i:math>-hard; (2) for state vectors, deciding whether the frame potential is larger than or smaller than certain values is <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mrow><m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">B</m:mi><m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Q</m:mi><m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</m:mi></m:mrow></m:mrow></m:mrow></m:math>-complete, provided that the promise gap between the two values is inverse polynomial in the number of qubits; and (3) for both state vectors and unitaries, this promise problem is <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><r:mrow><r:mrow><r:mrow><r:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</r:mi><r:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</r:mi></r:mrow></r:mrow></r:mrow></r:math>-complete if the promise gap is exponentially small. Second, we address the promise problem of deciding whether or not a given set is a good approximation to a design. Given a certain promise gap that could be constant, we show that this problem is <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><v:mrow><v:mrow><v:mrow><v:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</v:mi><v:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">P</v:mi></v:mrow></v:mrow></v:mrow></v:math>-hard, highlighting the inherent computational difficulty of determining properties of unitary and state designs. We further identify implications of our results, including variational methods for constructing designs, diagnosing quantum chaos, and exploring emergent designs in Hamiltonian systems.

PRX QuantumVol. 6(3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Kyoto University (JP), NTT (Japan) (JP), NTT Basic Research Laboratories (JP), Instituto de Física Teórica (ES), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology, Moonshot Research and Development Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.