Next Generation Sequencing Improves Diagnostic 16<scp>S</scp> r<scp>RNA</scp> Amplicon‐Based Microbiota Analyses of Clinical Samples Compared to Sanger Sequencing

Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is an important tool in addition to conventional methods for the identification of bacterial pathogens in human infections. In polymicrobial samples, Sanger sequencing can produce uninterpretable chromatograms. This limitation can be overcome by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of the 16S rRNA gene. We investigated the applicability of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene as a diagnostic routine method for pathogen detection in clinical samples. From June 2021 to August 2022, 101 clinical samples positive in PCR for partial 16S rRNA gene analysis were subjected to both Sanger and ONT sequencing. Sanger sequences were edited and compared with deposited sequences in the NCBI database using BLAST, while ONT data were processed using EPI2ME Fastq 16S. The positivity rate (clinically relevant pathogen) was higher for ONT vs. Sanger sequencing: 72% and 59%, respectively. Concordance between Sanger and ONT sequencing was 80%. Furthermore, ONT detected more samples with polymicrobial presence compared to Sanger (13 vs. 5) sequencing. Interestingly, in one joint fluid sample, Borrelia bissettiiae was identified by ONT but not by Sanger. The results show that the detection of both monobacterial and multiple bacterial species is improved using ONT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Apmis
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.70067
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Next Generation Sequencing Improves Diagnostic 16S rRNA Amplicon‐Based Microbiota Analyses of Clinical Samples Compared to Sanger Sequencing

Michael Kemp, Laus Krems Vejrum, Jens Jørgen Christensen, Christian Højte Schouw et al.
1 citations
Apmis
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
1.40
article

Next Generation Sequencing Improves Diagnostic 16S rRNA Amplicon‐Based Microbiota Analyses of Clinical Samples Compared to Sanger Sequencing

Michael Kemp, Laus Krems Vejrum, Jens Jørgen Christensen, Christian Højte Schouw, Xiaohui Chen Nielsen, Rimtas Dargis, Rikke Lykke Johansen, Tina Vasehus Madsen, Asta Lili Laugesen, Huma Aftab, Josefine Tange Møller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is an important tool in addition to conventional methods for the identification of bacterial pathogens in human infections. In polymicrobial samples, Sanger sequencing can produce uninterpretable chromatograms. This limitation can be overcome by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of the 16S rRNA gene. We investigated the applicability of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene as a diagnostic routine method for pathogen detection in clinical samples. From June 2021 to August 2022, 101 clinical samples positive in PCR for partial 16S rRNA gene analysis were subjected to both Sanger and ONT sequencing. Sanger sequences were edited and compared with deposited sequences in the NCBI database using BLAST, while ONT data were processed using EPI2ME Fastq 16S. The positivity rate (clinically relevant pathogen) was higher for ONT vs. Sanger sequencing: 72% and 59%, respectively. Concordance between Sanger and ONT sequencing was 80%. Furthermore, ONT detected more samples with polymicrobial presence compared to Sanger (13 vs. 5) sequencing. Interestingly, in one joint fluid sample, Borrelia bissettiiae was identified by ONT but not by Sanger. The results show that the detection of both monobacterial and multiple bacterial species is improved using ONT.

ApmisVol. 133(9)
Region Zealand (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.