Developing the <scp>FIGO</scp> ‐ <scp>IPPS</scp> “R U <scp>MOVVING SOMe</scp> ” classification system for female chronic pelvic pain

The goal was to develop a pragmatic classification system for conditions associated with chronic pelvic pain (CPP), aiming to enhance diagnosis, management, education, and research of CPP. An international, multidisciplinary panel participated in a modified RAND/UCLA Delphi consensus. This panel included healthcare professionals, medical society representatives, experts, individuals with lived experience of pain, advocacy groups, researchers, educators, and journal editors. The Delphi process comprised three rounds: two online surveys and one virtual meeting. Participants scored their agreement with statements using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree). A priori criteria for consensus were defined as follows: agreement, a mean score ≥7 with <15% scoring ≤3; disagreement, a mean score ≤3 with <15% scoring ≥7. Responses not meeting these criteria were considered indeterminate and advanced for further refinement in subsequent rounds. In round 1, 65 of 77 (84.4%) stakeholders participated; round 2 consisted of responses from 54 (70.1%) stakeholders, and 34 (44.2%) stakeholders engaged in round 3. The Delphi process yielded broad consensus on the definition of CPP and a corresponding classification system with the acronym R U MOVVING SOMe. This novel system comprises 12 categories: Reproductive, Urinary, Musculoskeletal, Other (not otherwise classified), Vulvovaginal, Vascular, Idiopathic (no pain contributor identified), Neurologic, Gastrointestinal, Sensitization/Nociplastic, Overlapping pain conditions, and Mental health. The R U MOVVING SOMe classification system represents a significant step towards a standardized framework for evaluating CPP. The high level of engagement and consensus among a diverse group of international stakeholders underscores its future potential to improve communication, clinical practice, education, and research in this challenging field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70522
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing the FIGO ‐ IPPS “R U MOVVING SOMe ” classification system for female chronic pelvic pain

Alexander Wang, Sawsan As‐Sanie, Georgine Lamvu, Jorge F. Carrillo et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
5.09
article

Developing the FIGO ‐ IPPS “R U MOVVING SOMe ” classification system for female chronic pelvic pain

Alexander Wang, Sawsan As‐Sanie, Georgine Lamvu, Jorge F. Carrillo, Malcolm G. Munro, Andrew W. Horne, Catherine Allaire, Juan Diego Villegas‐Echeverri, Susan Khalil
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The goal was to develop a pragmatic classification system for conditions associated with chronic pelvic pain (CPP), aiming to enhance diagnosis, management, education, and research of CPP. An international, multidisciplinary panel participated in a modified RAND/UCLA Delphi consensus. This panel included healthcare professionals, medical society representatives, experts, individuals with lived experience of pain, advocacy groups, researchers, educators, and journal editors. The Delphi process comprised three rounds: two online surveys and one virtual meeting. Participants scored their agreement with statements using a 9-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree). A priori criteria for consensus were defined as follows: agreement, a mean score ≥7 with <15% scoring ≤3; disagreement, a mean score ≤3 with <15% scoring ≥7. Responses not meeting these criteria were considered indeterminate and advanced for further refinement in subsequent rounds. In round 1, 65 of 77 (84.4%) stakeholders participated; round 2 consisted of responses from 54 (70.1%) stakeholders, and 34 (44.2%) stakeholders engaged in round 3. The Delphi process yielded broad consensus on the definition of CPP and a corresponding classification system with the acronym R U MOVVING SOMe. This novel system comprises 12 categories: Reproductive, Urinary, Musculoskeletal, Other (not otherwise classified), Vulvovaginal, Vascular, Idiopathic (no pain contributor identified), Neurologic, Gastrointestinal, Sensitization/Nociplastic, Overlapping pain conditions, and Mental health. The R U MOVVING SOMe classification system represents a significant step towards a standardized framework for evaluating CPP. The high level of engagement and consensus among a diverse group of international stakeholders underscores its future potential to improve communication, clinical practice, education, and research in this challenging field.

International Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsVol. 171(2)
University of Central Florida (US), West Los Angeles College (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Orlando Health (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Michigan (US), University of California System (US), British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health (CA), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Endometriosis UK (GB), MRC Centre for Reproductive Health (GB), Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (CO), Centre for Inflammation Research (GB), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
5.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.