Differences in the Corneal Biomechanical Responses to LASIK and KLEx Based on Parametric Numerical Simulation
Finite element simulations indicate that KLEx may provide improved corneal stability compared to LASIK under comparable surgical conditions. However, this biomechanical advantage is not absolute and depends on multiple factors, including refractive correction magnitude, central corneal thickness, and flap or cap thickness. These findings suggest that as refractive correction increases, cap or flap thickness decreases, or central corneal thickness increases, the biomechanical differences between KLEx and LASIK diminish. In certain cases, KLEx may exhibit biomechanical risks comparable to LASIK. These results highlight the need for a personalized approach in refractive surgery planning, considering both biomechanical and surgical complexity factors.
Authors
- Ahmed Elsheikh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7456-1749)
- XueFei Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-0334)
- Shenglong Luo
- Fangjun Bao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9881-6267)
- GuoXin Luo
- ShiHao Chen
- Liang-Ying He (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7115-2851)
- Fan Lü (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0846-147X)
- Junjie Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9891-4200)
- Fan Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5884-3751)
- XiaoBo Zheng
Institutions
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- Affiliated Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College (CN)
- Mianyang Third People's Hospital (CN)
- Nanyang Institute of Technology (CN)
- Nanyang Medical College (CN)
- The First People's Hospital of Guiyang (CN)
- Beijing Advanced Sciences and Innovation Center (CN)
- University College London (GB)
- Beihang University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 2025-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20250707-06
- Primary Topic
- Corneal surgery and disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00