Scoping Review of Co-Design in Mental Health Research: Essential Elements and Recommendations

Co-design is increasingly being adopted within mental health service design and delivery, but is less common in research. Co-design ensures that research is relevant and benefits people accessing services. This review examined frameworks, models, and/or guidelines for co-designing mental health research, asking: (a) How is co-design defined? (b) What are the elements, values, and design tools? (c) What recommendations are proposed? A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on co-design in mental health research was undertaken and narratively synthesized. A total of 28 studies were included, showing varied understandings of co-design. Key values included social justice, recognizing lived experience as expertise, and fostering safe and trusting relationships. Traditional academic structures often hinder co-design; however, innovative research methods have shown potential. Recommendations and strategies to overcome barriers are provided. To enhance the adoption of co-design in mental health research, clearer terminology and agreed-upon values and processes are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492251367259
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scoping Review of Co-Design in Mental Health Research: Essential Elements and Recommendations

Teresa Fawcett, Caroline Robertson, Justin Chapman, Rebecca Soole et al.
3 citations
OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
8.45
article

Scoping Review of Co-Design in Mental Health Research: Essential Elements and Recommendations

Teresa Fawcett, Caroline Robertson, Justin Chapman, Rebecca Soole, Marianne Wyder, Helena Roennfeldt, Victoria Stewart, Amanda Wheeler, Dan Siskind
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Co-design is increasingly being adopted within mental health service design and delivery, but is less common in research. Co-design ensures that research is relevant and benefits people accessing services. This review examined frameworks, models, and/or guidelines for co-designing mental health research, asking: (a) How is co-design defined? (b) What are the elements, values, and design tools? (c) What recommendations are proposed? A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on co-design in mental health research was undertaken and narratively synthesized. A total of 28 studies were included, showing varied understandings of co-design. Key values included social justice, recognizing lived experience as expertise, and fostering safe and trusting relationships. Traditional academic structures often hinder co-design; however, innovative research methods have shown potential. Recommendations and strategies to overcome barriers are provided. To enhance the adoption of co-design in mental health research, clearer terminology and agreed-upon values and processes are needed.

OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of ResearchVol. 46(2)
Griffith University (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Queensland (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scoping Review of Co-Design in Mental Health Research: Essential Elements and Recommendations — Teresa Fawcett, Caroline Robertson, et al. · OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS