Scoping Review of Co-Design in Mental Health Research: Essential Elements and Recommendations
Co-design is increasingly being adopted within mental health service design and delivery, but is less common in research. Co-design ensures that research is relevant and benefits people accessing services. This review examined frameworks, models, and/or guidelines for co-designing mental health research, asking: (a) How is co-design defined? (b) What are the elements, values, and design tools? (c) What recommendations are proposed? A scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature on co-design in mental health research was undertaken and narratively synthesized. A total of 28 studies were included, showing varied understandings of co-design. Key values included social justice, recognizing lived experience as expertise, and fostering safe and trusting relationships. Traditional academic structures often hinder co-design; however, innovative research methods have shown potential. Recommendations and strategies to overcome barriers are provided. To enhance the adoption of co-design in mental health research, clearer terminology and agreed-upon values and processes are needed.
Authors
- Teresa Fawcett
- Caroline Robertson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6711-8770)
- Justin Chapman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-2783)
- Rebecca Soole (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4262-3850)
- Marianne Wyder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-4232)
- Helena Roennfeldt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4569-1226)
- Victoria Stewart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2892-2288)
- Amanda Wheeler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9755-674X)
- Dan Siskind
Institutions
- Griffith University (AU)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Metro South Health (AU)
- Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research
- Published
- 2025-09-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492251367259
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.45