Climate, Rotation, and Tillage Impacts on Soybean Yield Gains in a 50‐Year Experiment

Understanding how interactive management practices and climatic behavior influence soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] productivity is imperative to inform future production systems under changing climate. This study examined eight unique long-term production systems from 1975 to 2024 on a fertile rainfed Mollisol in Indiana, USA. Using this 400-unit field-scale dataset comparing soybean in monocropping versus following maize (Zea mays L.) across four tillage intensities (Moldboard Plow, Chisel, Ridge/Strip-Till and No-Till), we investigated how these practices interact with each other and with weather patterns. Our focus was on the spring (1 April-20 June) and summer (21 June-30 September) periods, and their effects on final yields and morphometric plant phenes. Soybean yield results during the 50-year period, when spring temperatures increased by 1.6°C, reflected (i) consistently positive yield responses to higher spring temperatures, at the rate of 796 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>/°C, especially in monocropping, despite concurrent development of wetter springs and drier summers; (ii) improved yield resilience in the No-Till versus tilled systems; (iii) average soybean yields rotated with maize were 7.7% above those in monocropping but varied widely with tillage and year; and (iv) yield gain rates over time averaging 29.5 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> for monocropping and 25.6 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> for rotation. Plant height at 4- and 8-weeks post-planting was more influenced by air temperatures than precipitation, but final yield differences among tillage intensities were proportionately much smaller than relative soybean height differences in spring. These findings of consistent yield gains across multiple rotation and tillage regimes, despite changing climate factors, can inform actionable strategies for sustainable food production in future warming climate scenarios. Additionally, the unique rotation/tillage outcomes for 50 years provide a unique baseline for process-based crop model calibration to enhance our ability to design future cropping systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Biology
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70469
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soybean genetics and cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate, Rotation, and Tillage Impacts on Soybean Yield Gains in a 50‐Year Experiment

Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Shaun N. Casteel, Raziel A. Ordóñez, Tony J. Vyn et al.
3 citations
Global Change Biology
Soybean genetics and cultivation
5.25
article

Climate, Rotation, and Tillage Impacts on Soybean Yield Gains in a 50‐Year Experiment

Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Shaun N. Casteel, Raziel A. Ordóñez, Tony J. Vyn, Rachel Stevens
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Understanding how interactive management practices and climatic behavior influence soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] productivity is imperative to inform future production systems under changing climate. This study examined eight unique long-term production systems from 1975 to 2024 on a fertile rainfed Mollisol in Indiana, USA. Using this 400-unit field-scale dataset comparing soybean in monocropping versus following maize (Zea mays L.) across four tillage intensities (Moldboard Plow, Chisel, Ridge/Strip-Till and No-Till), we investigated how these practices interact with each other and with weather patterns. Our focus was on the spring (1 April-20 June) and summer (21 June-30 September) periods, and their effects on final yields and morphometric plant phenes. Soybean yield results during the 50-year period, when spring temperatures increased by 1.6°C, reflected (i) consistently positive yield responses to higher spring temperatures, at the rate of 796 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>/°C, especially in monocropping, despite concurrent development of wetter springs and drier summers; (ii) improved yield resilience in the No-Till versus tilled systems; (iii) average soybean yields rotated with maize were 7.7% above those in monocropping but varied widely with tillage and year; and (iv) yield gain rates over time averaging 29.5 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> for monocropping and 25.6 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> for rotation. Plant height at 4- and 8-weeks post-planting was more influenced by air temperatures than precipitation, but final yield differences among tillage intensities were proportionately much smaller than relative soybean height differences in spring. These findings of consistent yield gains across multiple rotation and tillage regimes, despite changing climate factors, can inform actionable strategies for sustainable food production in future warming climate scenarios. Additionally, the unique rotation/tillage outcomes for 50 years provide a unique baseline for process-based crop model calibration to enhance our ability to design future cropping systems.

Global Change BiologyVol. 31(9)
Iowa State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Purdue University, Corteva Agriscience, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Soybean genetics and cultivation
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.