Use of a Screening Tool for Dementia in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic

To study the use of a dementia screening tool in our clinic cohort of adults with Down syndrome. To evaluate the functionality of the NTG-EDSD for Dementia as part of a dementia screening protocol for adults with Down syndrome, we conducted a cohort analysis of patients aged 40 and older followed at the Massachusetts General Hospital Down Syndrome Program, noting any clinical interpretation of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). From September 2023 to September 2024, 54 NTG-EDSD responses were collected. Of these, 14 patients had a clinical interpretation of dementia and/or MCI, and 40 did not have a clinical interpretation of either. Due to the lack of a defined cutoff for the NTG-EDSD, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the NTG-EDSD across various scoring thresholds: ≥ 30, ≥ 20, ≥ 10, ≥ 5, ≥ 3, ≥ 2, and ≥ 1. Sensitivity decreased, and specificity increased as the threshold score rose. Lower thresholds (e.g., ≥ 1) captured all true positives but at the cost of many false positives, whereas higher thresholds (e.g., ≥ 20) improved specificity and positive predictive value, identifying fewer individuals overall but with greater diagnostic confidence. In a real-world clinical setting, the NTG-EDSD lacks sufficient accuracy as a stand-alone dementia screening tool for adults with Down syndrome but may still be useful for guiding caregiver conversations and identifying the need for further evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.64251
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of a Screening Tool for Dementia in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic

Margaret B. Pulsifer, Stephanie L. Santoro, Clorinda Cottrell, Caroline Bregman et al.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Use of a Screening Tool for Dementia in a Down Syndrome Specialty Clinic

Margaret B. Pulsifer, Stephanie L. Santoro, Clorinda Cottrell, Caroline Bregman, Nicolas M. Oreskovic, Brian G. Skotko, Amy Torres, Alexa Gozdiff Spognardi, Elizabeth Oey
article en

Abstract

To study the use of a dementia screening tool in our clinic cohort of adults with Down syndrome. To evaluate the functionality of the NTG-EDSD for Dementia as part of a dementia screening protocol for adults with Down syndrome, we conducted a cohort analysis of patients aged 40 and older followed at the Massachusetts General Hospital Down Syndrome Program, noting any clinical interpretation of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). From September 2023 to September 2024, 54 NTG-EDSD responses were collected. Of these, 14 patients had a clinical interpretation of dementia and/or MCI, and 40 did not have a clinical interpretation of either. Due to the lack of a defined cutoff for the NTG-EDSD, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the NTG-EDSD across various scoring thresholds: ≥ 30, ≥ 20, ≥ 10, ≥ 5, ≥ 3, ≥ 2, and ≥ 1. Sensitivity decreased, and specificity increased as the threshold score rose. Lower thresholds (e.g., ≥ 1) captured all true positives but at the cost of many false positives, whereas higher thresholds (e.g., ≥ 20) improved specificity and positive predictive value, identifying fewer individuals overall but with greater diagnostic confidence. In a real-world clinical setting, the NTG-EDSD lacks sufficient accuracy as a stand-alone dementia screening tool for adults with Down syndrome but may still be useful for guiding caregiver conversations and identifying the need for further evaluation.

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part AVol. 200(1)
Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.