An evaluation of the impact of social determinants of health in military reservists

Military reservists occupy a distinct social position, navigating dual roles as civilians and service members, an intersection that requires tailored intervention strategies. Despite their growing role in the total force, the social determinants of health (SDOH) affecting reservists remain underexamined. We were interested in how SDOH (i.e., education, employment status, financial strain, housing, or social support) influences suicidality, depressive symptoms, and wellbeing. As such, this study analyzed data from 4,007 U.S. military reservists, identifying largely positive mental health outcomes, with low levels of suicidality, low depressive symptoms, and moderate to high psychological wellbeing. Financial strain emerged as the most consistent and robust predictor of poor mental health across all outcomes. Regression analyses also highlighted recent homelessness and having legal challenges as key predictors. The findings highlight potential intervention opportunities, particularly for mid-career reservists aged 25-34, who are at a heightened risk of vulnerability. Targeted, multidisciplinary support, including housing stability, financial education, and legal assistance, may improve mental health and individual readiness among military reservists. Future research should examine variation across reserve components and service branches to better tailor services and support utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Military Psychology
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2556524
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation of the impact of social determinants of health in military reservists

Chris Hess, Katherine E. Moore, Kristin A. Horan, Brian A. Moore et al.
Military Psychology
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

An evaluation of the impact of social determinants of health in military reservists

Chris Hess, Katherine E. Moore, Kristin A. Horan, Brian A. Moore, Israel Sánchez‐Cardona, Kimberly D. Gomes, Tyler Collette, Patricia A. Ross, Bianca Channer, Thomas Hodges
article en

Abstract

Military reservists occupy a distinct social position, navigating dual roles as civilians and service members, an intersection that requires tailored intervention strategies. Despite their growing role in the total force, the social determinants of health (SDOH) affecting reservists remain underexamined. We were interested in how SDOH (i.e., education, employment status, financial strain, housing, or social support) influences suicidality, depressive symptoms, and wellbeing. As such, this study analyzed data from 4,007 U.S. military reservists, identifying largely positive mental health outcomes, with low levels of suicidality, low depressive symptoms, and moderate to high psychological wellbeing. Financial strain emerged as the most consistent and robust predictor of poor mental health across all outcomes. Regression analyses also highlighted recent homelessness and having legal challenges as key predictors. The findings highlight potential intervention opportunities, particularly for mid-career reservists aged 25-34, who are at a heightened risk of vulnerability. Targeted, multidisciplinary support, including housing stability, financial education, and legal assistance, may improve mental health and individual readiness among military reservists. Future research should examine variation across reserve components and service branches to better tailor services and support utilization.

Military Psychology
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Kennesaw State University (US), Department of Veterans Affairs (AU), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.